No Title

People who oppose advertising to children are being swept away on a tide of emotion based on anti-advertising prejudice and ignorance. They are overlooking economic reality. By John Shannon, president of Grey International

Like many of the key arguments about the future of advertising in Europe, the current battle over advertising to children is widely perceived as a straightforward clash between moral priorities and commercial ones.

Although driven by a variety of motives, not least protectionist trade policies, those who are lobbying in Brussels for a pan-European ban are generally doing so on the grounds that advertising is somehow bad for children.

They argue that until the age of 12, children are unable to differentiate between programming and advertising. In addition they complain that advertising encourages children to pester parents to buy products, regardless of cost.

It would be foolish to suggest that advertising does not generate consumer interest, but it is equally inane to be swept away on a tide of emotional argument based on anti-advertising prejudice and ignorance.

Those who oppose advertising to children under any circumstances generally tend to ignore economic realities and to reject out of hand the possibility that advertising could actually help to bring social benefit. They also fail to take account of the wide-ranging implications that their proposals hold for children’s programming as well as for the availability and price of children’s products in the retail market.

A study conducted recently by the European Group of Television Advertising, the representative body for some 25 public broadcasters, shows that member stations derive six per cent of their revenue from children’s advertising. Loss of this advertising revenue would seriously threaten investment in children’s programming.

In addition to the dangers to children’s programming budgets, the denial of consumer product information inevitably leads to fewer new product launches. This not only causes an erosion of consumer choice, but by reducing foreign competition for national manufacturers, opens the door to higher retail prices and removes any incentive for local manufacturers to develop and launch innovative new products.

Advertisers recognise that advertising to children must be carefully monitored and controlled, and it is quite right that rules and guidelines exist to ensure that such communications are handled responsibly.

But the role and value of advertising is broader and more positive than its detractors seem capable of appreciating. Only by acknowledging all the commercial and social realities can there be any hope of reaching a fair and mutually satisfactory solution on this long-standing and contentious issue.

Latest from Marketing Week


Access Marketing Week’s wealth of insight, analysis and opinion that will help you do your job better.

Register and receive the best content from the only UK title 100% dedicated to serving marketers' needs.

We’ll ask you just a few questions about what you do and where you work. The more we know about our visitors, the better and more relevant content we can provide for them. And, yes, knowing our audience better helps us find commercial partners too. Don't worry, we won't share your information with other parties, unless you give us permission to do so.

Register now


Our award winning editorial team (PPA Digital Brand of the Year) ask the big questions about the biggest issues on everything from strategy through to execution to help you navigate the fast moving modern marketing landscape.


From the opportunities and challenges of emerging technology to the need for greater effectiveness, from the challenge of measurement to building a marketing team fit for the future, we are your guide.


Information, inspiration and advice from the marketing world and beyond that will help you develop as a marketer and as a leader.

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3703 or email

If you are looking for our Jobs site, please click here