Should retailers want to be alone?

Sainsbury’s announcement that it is launching a fully-fledged banking service elicited a predictable response: it is a me-too effort designed to trump Tesco, which continues to hold most of the aces. Trailing profit figures from Sainsbury this week will do nothing to belie this picture: they will confirm just how strong Tesco’s hand is – at the moment.

But what of the future? Sainsbury’s has little option but to take the ‘strategic’ view. Only in the medium- to long-term can it hope to regain the initiative. Whether it will do so remains to be seen. For now, we can only comment on how divergent the marketing strategies of the two supermarket chains are likely to become – contrary to current appearances.

For Tesco is something of an oddity. It is sticking to a policy of ‘splendid isolation’ while most major high street players huddle for comfort in increasingly complex coalitions.

Yes, Tesco does have a tactical money-off alliance with B&Q and it does collaborate (very much as senior partner) with NatWest on the Clubcard Plus scheme. But this is a world away from the flurry of deal-making which has Sainsbury’s at its hub. Sainsbury’s, it will be recalled, is a fully paid-up member of the Smart Card consortium – which is the most developed of the brand coalitions. Among the consortium’s other partners are Next, Ford, Cellnet, Allied Domecq and, of course, the pivotal founder member Shell.

Both Sainsbury’s and Shell have an additional exclusivity agreement with Air Miles, which has suggested to some that they may inveigle Air Miles’ owner BA into the alliance – a coup indeed. But this secondary alliance is interesting for other reasons as well. In a recent ‘turf war’, Shell (which has Air Miles exclusivity over petrol forecourts) was forced to back off when Sainsbury’s chose to offer Air Miles on its own forecourts through its proprietary Reward card scheme.

The incident demonstrates not only Sainsbury’s importance in the pecking order, but also the fragility of this and other brand coalitions.

Certainly there are important strategic reasons why the partners should stick together. For example, partnership spreads the cost of expensive but invaluable loyalty schemes. It also provides a means of finessing the banks in the provision of retail financial services.

But coalitions are also subject to short-term conflicts of interest – which will become increasingly difficult to manage as more partners pile in. Compromise will be indispensable if the partnership is to survive. Yet implicit in compromise is the threat of brand dilution.

Tesco or Sainsbury’s; isolation or federalism? Which is the right route? It’s the Maastricht dilemma of marketing.v

Cover story page 36; News page 7; Pitcher page 27

Latest from Marketing Week


Access Marketing Week’s wealth of insight, analysis and opinion that will help you do your job better.

Register and receive the best content from the only UK title 100% dedicated to serving marketers' needs.

We’ll ask you just a few questions about what you do and where you work. The more we know about our visitors, the better and more relevant content we can provide for them. And, yes, knowing our audience better helps us find commercial partners too. Don't worry, we won't share your information with other parties, unless you give us permission to do so.

Register now


Our award winning editorial team (PPA Digital Brand of the Year) ask the big questions about the biggest issues on everything from strategy through to execution to help you navigate the fast moving modern marketing landscape.


From the opportunities and challenges of emerging technology to the need for greater effectiveness, from the challenge of measurement to building a marketing team fit for the future, we are your guide.


Information, inspiration and advice from the marketing world and beyond that will help you develop as a marketer and as a leader.

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3703 or email

If you are looking for our Jobs site, please click here