Camelot’s image suffers new dent

Although Camelot has enjoyed astonishing success in launching and running the National Lottery, the handling of its own brand image has been rather less blessed.

Take the draft document of its preliminary financial results, which fell into our hands a week before the expected date of publication, June 3. Little could be done, if we are to believe the company’s own analysis, about the the latest set of figures being less sparkling than the previous ones. Instants continued their ‘inevitable’ decline, to stabilise at 15m a week. Much more significant, there was no double rollover – which increases ticket sales for the draw by a factor of 100 per cent – in the current year. There were two the previous year.

Then again, it was coincidence that cumulative bonuses and incentives, based on historical performance as much as that of the immediate past, should swell the takings of some directors by over 40 per cent this year. And no one could definitely have foreseen that, by the time the results came out, a Labour government hostile to profit-making lottery operators would be in power. Nor that a scandal about one of the Lottery’s principal shareholders, Gtech, would erupt in the US.

All the same, what a juxtaposition of events – and what unfortunate timing for Camelot. Sadly, it only the latest in a chain of events which have dogged the company. As early as November 1996, Marketing Week was able to disclose that Camelot had breached its licence by setting up an international operations arm without the regulator Oflot’s permission. There followed revelations about Camelot’s curious relationship with CardCall, run by an undischarged bankrupt; and a wall-to-wall exposé of the operator’s strategic plans in The Mirror. Moreover, the objectivity of Oflot’s director general has been compromised by the revelation that he accepted free flights from one of Camelot’s shareholders. Still to come: the Richard Branson/Gtech libel case, which should prove a real coup de théâtre if it ever gets to court.

The case for change looks overwhelming. In Oflot’s case it is likely to be sooner rather than later, though what regulatory form this will take has yet to be clarified. The Government will also be able to pass, with little fear of serious opposition, a Lottery Bill clipping the wings of any future operator.

Camelot has, in this sense, played straight into the hands of its critics. The danger, in the present climate, is that ‘correctness’ will become a substitute for rational debate. It is at best unproven that a non-profit making organisation can make a better job of marketing the Lottery. We should beware of being carried away on a wave of Bransonesque fervour.

News, page 5; Gtech page 7

Latest from Marketing Week


Access Marketing Week’s wealth of insight, analysis and opinion that will help you do your job better.

Register and receive the best content from the only UK title 100% dedicated to serving marketers' needs.

We’ll ask you just a few questions about what you do and where you work. The more we know about our visitors, the better and more relevant content we can provide for them. And, yes, knowing our audience better helps us find commercial partners too. Don't worry, we won't share your information with other parties, unless you give us permission to do so.

Register now


Our award winning editorial team (PPA Digital Brand of the Year) ask the big questions about the biggest issues on everything from strategy through to execution to help you navigate the fast moving modern marketing landscape.


From the opportunities and challenges of emerging technology to the need for greater effectiveness, from the challenge of measurement to building a marketing team fit for the future, we are your guide.


Information, inspiration and advice from the marketing world and beyond that will help you develop as a marketer and as a leader.

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3711 or email

If you are looking for our Jobs site, please click here