Evolution preferable to revolution at Talk Radio

Radio is going through curious times. Not only has it wooed TV celebrities off the box and onto the airwaves, but now it has courted ex-newspaper editors and media moguls. Shameless flirting still goes a long way in the media.

When CLT-Ufa decided to put its portfolio of radio stations up for sale, it was Atlantic 252 that generated the most interest from commentators. Would Capital snap it up with the unspent cash from the Virgin bid or not?

But with little news on that front, attention is now turning to Talk Radio. The bids come from Kelvin MacKenzie’s News International-backed consortium and a management buyout headed by Paul Robinson, the current managing director. Which one looks the best bet for advertisers?

To answer this, the advertising fraternity needs to question whether Talk Radio should continue to evolve, as it has been for the last year, or if it needs a fresh focus from a new investor.

Talk Radio is now starting to win over previously sceptical advertisers.

When it began broadcasting in 1995, it was less shockjock and more ‘hamjock’ programming that made it stutter in the market, but it’s programming has improved considerably since then.

The current management team has begun to understand the station’s place in the radio mix. It has instituted serious programming initiatives – the hiring of Kirsty Young, the inherent attraction of James Whale, and the ‘can’t lose’ rationale of broadcasting football – though without Premier League broadcast rights this may falter.

On the other hand, it remains the smallest of the national stations and it continues to require an owner with deep pockets. It is not clear if the management buyout team can raise this kind of long-term backing.

This leads us onto Kelvin MacKenzie’s bid. Undoubtedly the investment would be there to make Talk Radio a competitive player into the millennium. And MacKenzie and News International’s track records are impressive.

However, a niggling question remains. The current operators of the station know their product, their potential consumers, and how to sell that product to advertisers.

MacKenzie’s expertise, on the other hand, comes from a very different arena. And further, that expertise has principally been honed in a tabloid environment. Do we want to listen to ‘shock-bunny’ programming, if that is what is planned?

Speech-based programming is a difficult beast to tame and an even harder one to master. If the backing is there for the management buyout, my feeling is that advertisers are better served by evolution rather than revolution. Talk Radio has had enough of that in it’s short history.

Latest from Marketing Week


Access Marketing Week’s wealth of insight, analysis and opinion that will help you do your job better.

Register and receive the best content from the only UK title 100% dedicated to serving marketers' needs.

We’ll ask you just a few questions about what you do and where you work. The more we know about our visitors, the better and more relevant content we can provide for them. And, yes, knowing our audience better helps us find commercial partners too. Don't worry, we won't share your information with other parties, unless you give us permission to do so.

Register now


Our award winning editorial team (PPA Digital Brand of the Year) ask the big questions about the biggest issues on everything from strategy through to execution to help you navigate the fast moving modern marketing landscape.


From the opportunities and challenges of emerging technology to the need for greater effectiveness, from the challenge of measurement to building a marketing team fit for the future, we are your guide.


Information, inspiration and advice from the marketing world and beyond that will help you develop as a marketer and as a leader.

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3703 or email customerservices@marketingweek.com

If you are looking for our Jobs site, please click here