Sell the science, but not your soul

To paraphrase Maureen Lipman’s Beattie: what does it matter as long as it’s an ‘ology’? That, in a nutshell, is the attitude of most big food brands towards the endorsement of their products by objective scientific opinion. They need no lessons in the efficacy of such a stamp of approval in leveraging sales; their only concern is that it should be both authentic and credible.

And who can blame them? Brands, after all, exist to make a profit; endorsement is merely a tool to that end, to be disposed of if it becomes blunt. Sadly, for those supplying the endorsement, the relationship is more complex, the motives shrouded in ambiguity and the results often less than satisfactory.

So why do charities – whose research provides much of the scientific material – continue to involve themselves in such alliances with the profit motive? The disastrous partnership between the British Heart Foundation and Nestlé, which led to the latter being fined &£7,500 for implying falsely that eating Shredded Wheat reduces the risk of coronary heart disease, should be lesson enough. And, if it were not, a further lesson comes from the British Dental Association’s backing of Ribena Toothkind, which ended in tears after a judge decreed that manufacturer SmithKline Beecham had claimed, falsely again, that Ribena Toothkind ‘does not encourage tooth decay’.

Yet, despite the risks, not-for-profit bodies still play the endorsement game. In the past few weeks, a number of respected voluntary bodies have been drawn into controversy over brand affiliations. They include the British Dietetic Association, for backing a health claim by Heinz, which has been widely condemned as untenable; and the BHF (again), the National Osteoporosis Society and the Family Heart Association, which were all criticised in a wide-ranging report by the Food Commission.

Certainly, the controversy engendered will have succeeded in raising the profile of these bodies – but not in a way calculated to improve their reputation for being disinterested repositories of public trust. So why do they do it?

The answer seems to be a mixture of naivety and desperation. In many cases, certainly those affecting charities, the underlying issue is saliency – or rather lack of it. Without a high profile, individual charities struggle to be heard – particularly in the era of the National Lottery – in the welter of competition that comprises their sector; and if they are not heard, how can they be expected to levy vital subscriptions from the public? Yet the means of achieving that level of awareness are beyond the resources of all but a very few (already well-known) organisations. A leg-up from a friendly, and powerful, brand must seem like a godsend.

Except that the help proffered never comes without strings attached. What may seem, on paper, a mutually beneficial arrangement risks losing its integrity as the campaign evolves. A campaign, incidentally, in which the charity will at best be a junior partner, exercising little control over the outcome.

The moral? If you must sup with the devil, go, as Diabetes UK does, armed with a comprehensive 12-page book of guidelines – as well as a long spoon.

Latest from Marketing Week

Marketing through the ages: The 2000s bring the dilemmas of digital

As part of our 40th birthday celebration, we asked previous editors to sum up marketing and Marketing Week during their time at the helm. Ruth Mortimer was editor in the early 2010s as the impact of digital led to real challenges over scale versus consolidation of power, audience versus context and personal versus personalisation.


Access Marketing Week’s wealth of insight, analysis and opinion that will help you do your job better.

Register and receive the best content from the only UK title 100% dedicated to serving marketers' needs.

We’ll ask you just a few questions about what you do and where you work. The more we know about our visitors, the better and more relevant content we can provide for them. And, yes, knowing our audience better helps us find commercial partners too. Don't worry, we won't share your information with other parties, unless you give us permission to do so.

Register now


Our award winning editorial team (PPA Digital Brand of the Year) ask the big questions about the biggest issues on everything from strategy through to execution to help you navigate the fast moving modern marketing landscape.


From the opportunities and challenges of emerging technology to the need for greater effectiveness, from the challenge of measurement to building a marketing team fit for the future, we are your guide.


Information, inspiration and advice from the marketing world and beyond that will help you develop as a marketer and as a leader.

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3703 or email

If you are looking for our Jobs site, please click here