Keep corporate ethics within sales context

The article “Make the most of your ethics” (MW June 9) missed two key points: firstly, environmental and ethical factors are just one element of a company’s overall reputation; and secondly there is no “one size fits all” solution.

Clearly ethical issues are important for all companies. Our own data shows that when asked about environmentally friendly products, 15 per cent more UK consumers think this is the responsibility of companies rather than individuals.

The thornier question is whether having a good corporate reputation will actually influence sales. Our corporate reputation research, CRED (Corporate Reputation Diagnostic) shows that ethical and environmental issues (what we call a company’s “public responsibility”) are just one of three core elements of reputation. CRED allows marketers to put public responsibility into context alongside “leadership and success” (being seen as a winner) and “consumer fairness” (doing the right thing by your customers, such as charging fair prices and producing good-quality products and services).

This is important because measures of public responsibility generally have a significantly lower impact on sales than leadership and consumer fairness factors. So even though consumers want to act responsibly, they don’t always follow that through into their buying behaviour.

A detailed understanding of a company’s corporate and brand relationship is also key. In sectors where the industry as a whole has a relatively poor environmental reputation (for example, motor fuel), corporate efforts are essential and can also be promoted as a means to genuine product differentiation.

On the other hand, corporations that have a weak link between their corporate identity and their brands, such as Altria, Diageo and Unilever, will find that their corporate reputation does not have much influence on buying behaviour. So while these relatively low-profile companies should have sufficient responsibility efforts in place (it is not only the right thing to do, but it also defends against the potential downside of negative PR), it will probably not make sense for them to use precious marketing resources communicating their efforts to consumers.

Instead, this budget would be better spent focusing on improving product quality, price and packaging – and then making consumers aware of those advances.

Corporations that do not consider ethical and environmental issues as part of a holistic business planning process could inadvertently waste budget, or damage their brands or product sales.

Duncan Southgate

Research and development

Millward Brown

Tachbrook Park


Latest from Marketing Week


Access Marketing Week’s wealth of insight, analysis and opinion that will help you do your job better.

Register and receive the best content from the only UK title 100% dedicated to serving marketers' needs.

We’ll ask you just a few questions about what you do and where you work. The more we know about our visitors, the better and more relevant content we can provide for them. And, yes, knowing our audience better helps us find commercial partners too. Don't worry, we won't share your information with other parties, unless you give us permission to do so.

Register now


Our award winning editorial team (PPA Digital Brand of the Year) ask the big questions about the biggest issues on everything from strategy through to execution to help you navigate the fast moving modern marketing landscape.


From the opportunities and challenges of emerging technology to the need for greater effectiveness, from the challenge of measurement to building a marketing team fit for the future, we are your guide.


Information, inspiration and advice from the marketing world and beyond that will help you develop as a marketer and as a leader.

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3703 or email

If you are looking for our Jobs site, please click here