Strong leaders pull ahead

McCann Erickson has come out top in this year’s Marketing Week Agency Reputations Survey, closely followed by Saatchi & Saatchi. Both have colourful characters at their helm, so are we entering a period where personality has become a ke

Advertising agencies run by executives with exuberant personalities are winning the respect of senior marketers, Marketing Week‘s annual survey of agency reputations suggests. This year’s survey shows a significant amount of movement compared to previous years, with some well-known agencies slipping down the league table, while others have taken a number of steps up to replace them.

One agency falling into the latter category is McCann Erickson, voted by the UK’s top marketers as the most well-thought of agency in the land this year. One suspects that the bouncy personality of McCann boss Rupert Howell may have helped to persuade marketing chiefs that the agency has recovered after a few tough years.

One of advertising’s best-known and ebullient characters, Howell – who joined the Interpublic Group-owned agency as UK and Ireland chairman and European president in October 2003 (MW August 6, 2003) – appears to have driven the agency back to the forefront of marketers’ minds over the past 18 months.

Twice at the top

This is the second time McCann has reached the top in Marketing Week‘s Agency Reputations Survey, having first received this accolade in 2001. Then, the face of regional director Ben Langdon, another of the advertising world’s more colourful characters, adorned the cover of Marketing Week. With the aid of the Bacardi cat and Langdon’s undoubted skill at self-publicity, McCann shot to the top from the fourth place it held last year. Both Howell and Langdon have succeeded in breathing some personality into an agency often derided as a faceless global network pumping out bland ads for bureaucratic multinational clients. When Langdon left in 2003 (MW June 26, 2003), Howell was his surprise replacement.

Ben Langdon

The agency has been through a tumultuous time over the past few years, with financial irregularities, account losses and senior management churn. But Howell has plundered rival agencies to assemble a crack squad of top-class executives and has set McCann on the road to recovery. While some say the team has yet to prove itself, and point to a chequered performance at winning and retaining business, the agency has improved its reputation across the board in this year’s survey. It has risen to joint fourth on creativity – long considered one of its weak points. This move up the table may have resulted from Howell’s hiring of celebrated creative director Robert Campbell from Rainey Kelly Campbell Roalfe/Y&R (MW October 22, 2003).

McCann is also seen as the agency most able to act in clients’ longer-term best interests based on an understanding of their business, and triumphed in four other categories: attentiveness and adaptability; quality of account managers; financial stability and strong agency management; and coverage of markets outside the UK.

McCann’s recent major wins include two pieces of business for the Co-op, RHM Foods’ Bisto and Sharwood’s accounts, Intel, Signet and Bendicks. It has lost Birds Eye, Capital One and resigned Greene King, Norwich Union and Bacardi.

In second place in the survey is another agency that has put an extravagant personality in charge – Saatchi & Saatchi. Saatchi’s has spent years in the wilderness after performing strongly in the survey’s early years. Since the departure of founding brothers Maurice and Charles to establish M&C Saatchi, there have been question marks over leadership at the pair’s original agency.

In October last year, new chief executive Lee Daley, formerly boss of WPP’s Red Cell network and a keen soul dancer, took the helm. Creative director Kate Stanners, previously of St Luke’s, also came on board.

A daley dose does wonders

Like Howell, Daley is seen as one of the advertising world’s more memorable characters. But some believe he merely talks a good game and, as with Howell’s position at McCann, say the real proof of his sound leadership has yet to materialise. Even so, his reputation appears to have made an impact on the nation’s top marketers. Saatchi was ranked third in creativity, after Bartle Bogle Hegarty and Mother; first equal in ability to act in clients’ longer-term interests; and first in marketing strategy and analysis, among other plaudits.

One source says: “Saatchi & Saatchi’s previous boss, Kevin Dundas, was on the bridge trying to turn the tanker around and he did a pretty good job, clearing the way for Daley to come in. From an internal point of view, Daley has given the agency some of the dynamism and enthusiasm it has lacked. The question is whether that can be translated into creative work and new business.”

This is Marketing Week‘s 16th annual survey, and a significant long-term trend over the years has been the rising profile of media agencies. There are nine in the overall top 30 this year, a higher number than in previous years. This surely reflects a realisation among marketers of the increasingly vital role media planning and buying plays in a world of atomising media.

The best-performing media agency this year is MediaCom, which is third overall, slipping from its number two spot last year. It has been voted top for media planning, buying and placement and comes second in value for money. It claims to have won more than &£330m of new business, with such companies as Entertainment Film Distributors, BSkyB, Shell and Jaeger. It is credited with having a steady senior management headed by chief executive Stephen Allan. The takeover of its parent Grey by WPP Group in September does not seem to have dented its new business form.

Kelly Clark

March of the media agencies

While MediaCom’s great rival, Carat, has retained its position in the overall reputations table at number eight, MindShare has also entered the top ten, perhaps reflecting a strong year under chief executive Kelly Clark. And new into the top 30 this year come All Response Media, Vizeum, Universal McCann, MediaEdge:CIA, Brand Connection and Starcom MediaVest, which has crashed in at 16th place. Naked Communications, the “media neutral” planning shop, has entered the top 30 at number 18.

However, MediaCom’s parent, Grey, has disappeared from the overall top 30 altogether, perhaps reflecting the departure of yet another high-profile agency manager, Garry Lace (MW March 18, 2004). He has joined Lowe London (MW January 13), and this seems to have helped it get back into the top 30 at 28th.

The UK’s biggest-billing agency, Abbott Mead Vickers.BBDO, has slipped back to number four this year from number one last year. Its score declined in categories such as ability to act in clients’ longer-term interests, marketing strategy and analysis, attentiveness and adaptability and quality of account managers. But it has been voted top in the value for money category, climbing to first place from fourth last year.

Some think AMV has been treading water, neither powering ahead nor losing its way. But retaining the hard-fought Sainsbury’s account (MW April 28) in the face of fierce competition, particularly from JWT, with which it was involved in a final shoot out, shows it is still capable of putting up a fight, though it has not pulled in any major pieces of new business, apart from the RAC (MW June 9). JWT, meanwhile has drifted further down the table. The agency was said to be hugely disappointed by its failure to win Sainsbury’s, and thought it had come up with a better campaign. But the new Sainsbury’s team evidently decided that it would be more risky to switch than to stay with the same agency.

Even so, JWT has been busy integrating the HSBC and Samsung business which it has won internationally, though this was largely down to being part of the WPP network (MW November 17, 2004). Observers say JWT is doing better than it has for a long time, particularly under creative director Nick Bell, though a place in the top ten for creativity eludes it.

The reputations survey assesses marketers’ perceptions of an agency across nine criteria. It is vital to know just how they see the relative importance of each criterion. There is usually little movement in the importance attached to them from year to year, save for a constant duel for first place between creativity and value for money, surely the two key issues for brand owners. This year, value for money in results achieved has won out, with creativity second – a reversal of the position last year.

Cheap rubbish is still rubbish

Is value for money possible without creativity? Probably, though it is generally accepted that the creative spark is essential to making a brand famous these days. And as ad-skipping personal video recorders become more widespread, many advertising creatives believe that making entertaining commercials will be the best way to ensure people watch an ad.

Bartle Bogle Hegarty is among the most active proponents of ads as entertainment and has regained the creative crown this year, taking the number one spot jointly with last year’s outright winner, Mother. BBH’s creative highlights over the year have included work for Robinsons, dialogue-based ads for Levi’s and the “getting dressed” television work for Lynx.

Its strong creative performance has helped it rocket up the overall reputations table to number five from 16th place last time. But Mother has fallen to joint 20th from joint 11th, reflecting, perhaps, the fact that it is now at a crossroads, integrating existing business, but no longer the small boutique it once was.

One observer sees the past year in the industry as unremarkable from a creative point of view. “There is a paucity of good creative campaigns, partly because of the dilution of creative talent. You used to have lots of good creatives in one agency, but these days they are all over the place.” This, he says, is because a glut of start-ups has soaked up talent, while a lot of creative directors have left established agencies to set up shop on their own. And he adds: “Clients are becoming conservative, protecting their jobs, tending to research everything to justify what they are spending money on.”

The agency whose creative reputation has risen most strongly is M&C Saatchi. It has come equal sixth in the category with Wieden & Kennedy, the agency credited with creating this year’s best campaign, the Honda Diesel ad. But while W&K does not make it into the top 30 overall, M&C has risen further than any other agency, moving up to number seven from equal 20th last time. Interestingly, it has come equal second in financial stability and strong agency management, which suggests its stock-market flotation last year may be paying dividends in terms of an enhanced reputation among marketers. The news that its signature client, British Airways, is reviewing its account broke after the survey research was conducted in May, and is considered to be a blow to the agency.

A noteworthy performance has been put in by DDB London, formerly BMP DDB, which has risen to eighth place from 20th and which appears to be staging a recovery under another adland charmer, chief executive Paul Hammersley. Hammersley has hired chief strategic officer David Hackworthy to help the agency regain some of its reputation for smart thinking and smart work.

Steady as they go

Cilla Snowball

Rainey Kelly Campbell Roalfe/Y&R is the highest entrant in the new top 20, coming in at joint 12th. This is an endorsement for the management team, headed by James Murphy, which has taken over from the agency’s founders, three of whom have left, with only Mark Roalfe still at the agency. Meanwhile, the likes of Ogilvy & Mather, Publicis and WCRS are all hovering around mid-table. This justifies the view of one observer that many established agencies are “holding steady” in what has been an unremarkable year for big swings in agency fortunes.

Much has been made of the rise of independent agencies in recent years, and they do seem to be making their mark, with Delaney Lund Knox Warren & Partners entering the top 20 at joint 18th. Clemmow Hornby Inge has edged up to 15th, though Mother has slipped back to 20 from 11 last time. One source says the independents seem to have hit saturation. “There has been a trend back to the bigger agencies, as can be seen with some of the big pitches where clients have been looking for safety and resources. There is a feeling that the good medium-sized indies are at a stage where they are running at capacity and you have lost any reason for going there in the first place.”

Other agencies that have done well include direct marketing provider Tequila/London, part of TBWA – though the ad agency TBWA/London has slipped back to 12th from fifth last year. Into the top 30 come Fallon, the Leith Agency and The Union, while Euro RSCG London, the new home of Ben Langdon, has stayed at number 25.

It will be interesting to see whether the advertising industry’s biggest personalities – Howell at McCann, Daley at Saatchi, Lace at Lowe, Cilla Snowball at AMV and Langdon at Euro – manage to improve the standing of their agencies in marketers’ eyes over the next year. They are under intense scrutiny. They know the UK’s top marketers will be watching them closely between now and next year’s survey.

Best agency overall

2005 2004 Agency Actual Number As % of max*** 1 3 McCann Erickson 54 9 2 6 Saatchi & Saatchi 51 8 3 2 MediaCom 42 7 4 1 Abbott Mead Vickers.BBDO 41 7 5 16 Bartle Bogle Hegarty 39 6 6 4 JWT* 31 5 7 20= M&C Saatchi 28 4 8= 8 Carat 26 4 8= 20= DDB London 26 4 10= 11= MindShare 24 4 10= 7 Ogilvy & Mather 24 4 12= – Rainey Kelly Campbell Roalfe/Y&R 23 4 12= 5 TBWA/London 23 4 14 18= Publicis 22 4 15 17 Clemmow Hornby Inge 20 3 16= – Starcom MediaVest 19 3 16= 10 WCRS 19 3 18= 21 BDH/TBWA 18 3 18= – Naked Communications 18 3 20= – Delaney Lund Knox Warren & Partners 17 3 20= 11= Mother 17 3 22 – Brand Connection 16 3 23= – Tequila/London 15 2 23= – The Union 15 2 25= 25= Euro RSCG London 14 2 25= – Fallon 14 2 25= ** OMD 14 2 28 – Lowe London 13 2 29= – The Leith Agency 12 2 29= – Mediaedge:CIA 12 2 29= – Universal McCann 12 2 29= – Vizeum 12 2 29= – All Response Media 12 2

Best agency overall

* Formerly J Walter Thompson

** Manning Gottlieb OMD rated 18= in 2004, OMD UK rated 25= in 2004

– Not ranked in 2004 top 30

*** Out of 623 votes


2005 2004 Agency % naming agency* 1= 4 Bartle Bogle Hegarty 14 1= 1 Mother 14 3 8= Saatchi & Saatchi 11 4= 3 Abbott Mead Vickers.BBDO 10 4= 6= McCann Erickson 10 6= – M&C Saatchi 8 6= – Wieden & Kennedy 8 8= – DDB London 6 8= – Delaney Lund Knox Warren & Part. 6 8= 2 TBWA/London 6


* Base for percentage =80 respondents who named up to three agencies each

– Not ranked in 2004 top ten

Planning, buying and placement

2005 2004 Agency % naming agency* 1 1 MediaCom 17 2 2 Carat 13 3 7= Starcom MediaVest 10 4= – BLM Media 8 4= – Brand Connection 8 4= – Mediaedge:CIA 8 4= – Naked Communications 8 8= 4 MindShare 6 8= – OMD 6 10= 9= Media Planning Group 5 10= 9= Universal McCann 5

Planning, buying and placement

* Base for percentage =78 respondents who named up to three agencies each

– Not ranked in 2004 top ten

Value for money

2005 2004 Agency % naming agency* 1 4 Abbott Mead Vickers.BBDO 8 2 1 MediaCom 7 3= 2 McCann Erickson 6 3= 7= Saatchi & Saatchi 6 5= – Carat 4 5= – Clemmow Hornby Inge 4 5= 7= DDB London 4 5= 7= JWT 4 5= – Joshua 4 5= – Manning Gottlieb OMD 4 5= – The Union 4

Value for money

* Base for percentage =71 respondents who named up to three agencies each

– Not ranked in 2004 top ten

Ability to act in clients’ long-term best interests

2005 2004 Agency % naming agency* 1= 3= McCann Erickson 9 1= 9= Saatchi & Saatchi 9 3= – Bartle Bogle Hegarty 7 3= 2 JWT 7 5= 1 Abbott Mead Vickers.BBDO 6 5= – Delaney Lund Knox Warren & Part. 6 5= 3= MediaCom 6 5= 6= WCRS 6 9= – DDB London 4 9= – MindShare 4 9= – PHD Media 4

Ability to act in clients’ long-term best interests

* Base for percentage =69 respondents who named up to three agencies each

– Not ranked in 2004 top ten

Marketing strategy and analysis

2005 2004 Agency % naming agency* 1 8= Saatchi & Saatchi 14 2 – Bartle Bogle Hegarty 8 3 2= JWT 7 4= – DDB London 5 4= – Mother 5 6= 2= Abbott Mead Vickers.BBDO 4 6= – BDH/TBWA 4 6= – Lowe London 4 6= – M&C Saatchi 4 6= 1 McCann Erickson 4 6= 4= MediaCom 4 6= – MindShare 4 6= 4= Ogilvy & Mather 4 6= – Rainey Kelly Campbell Roalfe/Y&R 4

Marketing strategy and analysis

* Base for percentage =73 respondents who named up to three agencies each

– Not ranked in 2004 top ten

Attentiveness and adaptability

2005 2004 Agency % naming agency* 1= 5= McCann Erickson 7 1= 2= Saatchi & Saatchi 7 3= – M&C Saatchi 6 3= 2= MediaCom 6 5= 1 Abbott Mead Vickers.BBDO 4 5= – BDH/TBWA 4 5= – Clemmow Hornby Inge 4 5= – DDB London 4 5= 10= MindShare 4 5= – OMD 4 5= – Rainey Kelly Campbell Roalfe/Y&R 4 5= 10= WCRS 4

Attentiveness and adaptability

* Base for percentage =67 respondents who named up to three agencies each

– Not ranked in 2004 top ten

Quality of account managers

2005 2004 Agency % naming agency* 1= 5 McCann Erickson 9 1= 4 Saatchi & Saatchi 9 3 8 Bartle Bogle Hegarty 8 4= 1 Abbott Mead Vickers.BBDO 7 4= 6= JWT 7 4= 3 TBWA/London 7 7= 6= Clemmow Hornby Inge 5 7= 9= M&C Saatchi 5 7= – Ogilvy & Mather 5 7= – Rainey Kelly Campbell Roalfe/Y&R 5

Quality of account managers

* Base for percentage =75 respondents who named up to three agencies each

– Not ranked in 2004 top ten

Financial stability/strong management

2005 2004 Agency % naming agency* 1 3 McCann Erickson 11 2= 1= Abbott Mead Vickers.BBDO 9 2= – M&C Saatchi 9 2= 5 MediaCom 9 2= 6 Saatchi & Saatchi 9 2= 10= WPP Group 9 7= 10= Bartle Bogle Hegarty 6 7= 7= Carat 6 7= 1= JWT 6 7= 4 Ogilvy & Mather 6 7= 10= Publicis 6 7= – Rainey Kelly Campbell Roalfe/Y&R 6

Financial stability/strong management

* Base for percentage =70 respondents who named up to three agencies each

– Not ranked in 2004 top ten

Coverage outside the UK

2005 2004 Agency % naming agency* 1 1 McCann Erickson 25 2 6= Publicis Groupe 20 3 2 JWT 18 4 4= Abbott Mead Vickers.BBDO 13 5= 2= Ogilvy & Mather 10 5= 4= Saatchi & Saatchi 10 5= 9= WPP Group 10 8= – Bartle Bogle Hegarty 8 8= – Lowe & Partners 8 8= 9= TBWA/London 8

Coverage outside the UK

* Base for percentage =40 respondents who named up to three agencies each

– Not ranked in 2004 top ten

Latest from Marketing Week


Access Marketing Week’s wealth of insight, analysis and opinion that will help you do your job better.

Register and receive the best content from the only UK title 100% dedicated to serving marketers' needs.

We’ll ask you just a few questions about what you do and where you work. The more we know about our visitors, the better and more relevant content we can provide for them. And, yes, knowing our audience better helps us find commercial partners too. Don't worry, we won't share your information with other parties, unless you give us permission to do so.

Register now


Our award winning editorial team (PPA Digital Brand of the Year) ask the big questions about the biggest issues on everything from strategy through to execution to help you navigate the fast moving modern marketing landscape.


From the opportunities and challenges of emerging technology to the need for greater effectiveness, from the challenge of measurement to building a marketing team fit for the future, we are your guide.


Information, inspiration and advice from the marketing world and beyond that will help you develop as a marketer and as a leader.

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3703 or email

If you are looking for our Jobs site, please click here