The experts’ views on mice and men will often go awry

It takes an expert to defy common sense by asserting that advertising makes us fat or, as we were told last week, mice don’t like cheese.

Some years ago, in the course of my journalistic duties, it was my misfortune to interview a sententious old boy, the type who sits at a corner bar stool, wears a cravat and has his own monogrammed tankard. During the conversation I used the work expert. It was a mistake.

“Ah, expert,” he said, and if he did not at that point take a dribbling pipe from his mouth, he should have done. “Expert comes in two parts: ex, meaning past-it, or done for; and spurt, meaning a small squirt.” And with that, he sat back with the sort of small, satisfied smile that might have crossed Socrates’ face after uttering a particularly telling fragment of dialectic.

The trouble is that the old sod was right. Experts are not to be trusted. Marketing has, over the years, been afflicted by more than its fair share of expert opinion. These sages usually believe that marketing in general – and advertising in particular – has no effect on them personally, as they are much too clever and above such things, but is capable of influencing lesser beings, invariably for the worse.

By this argument, it is because of advertising that impressionable people inhale and ingest all manner of things that are bad for them; it is also through advertising that the same, simple folk are persuaded to want things they would not otherwise have wanted – and without which they would be better off. It follows, in the opinion of experts, that much good is to be achieved and many lives saved by the simple expedient of banning advertising.

If I may be permitted to remove a dribbling pipe from my mouth, experts come in two types: those who wish to scare the wits out of lay people and those who take pleasure in debunking lay people’s cherished beliefs.

The former are fond of the phrase, “it’s not a matter of if, but when”. So, a hurricane is going to devastate New York, a meteorite is going to collide with Earth, the polar ice caps are going to melt. Don’t think it won’t happen, because it’s not a matter of if, but when.

The latter look around for some treasured item of popular folklore and, with smug satisfaction, declare it to be a foolish fantasy. So don’t think you will get less wet if you run through rain, or that vitamin C will ward off colds, because both are examples of silly received opinion.

On rare occasions, however, the layman bites back – and what fun it is when he does. We had just such an example only last week. First came the utterance of the expert. David Holmes, whose unusual calling is that of an animal behaviourist at Manchester Metropolitan University, stepped out from his laboratory and declared that mice are totally uninterested in cheese.

“They respond to the smell, texture and taste of food. Cheese is something that would not be available in their natural environment and, therefore, not something that they would respond to,” Holme said. According to this expert, mice actually prefer to eat grains, fruit and cereals.

Well, I used to have a pet Labrador who, true to his breed, had a prodigious and catholic appetite. I doubt that peeled prawns and Maltesers, two of his favourite items, were stalked in the wild by his wolf ancestors, but he was prepared to give them a go.

So isn’t it possible that mice, while unlikely to come across mature cheddar during their normal daily foraging in fields, might enjoy a nibble if it were put before them? Support for this view came swiftly. On the Daily Telegraph letters page, David Sharp of Peterborough wrote: “I was asked, last year, to deal with a mouse infestation and used three traps, approximately six inches from one another. One, based on the theory of ‘natural’ bait, had apple as an attractant, another milk chocolate and the third cheddar cheese. The result after six weeks was: chocolate 0, apple 0, cheese 22. My conclusion? These particular mice preferred cheese to apple or chocolate.”

Josephine Gilbert of Hemel Hempstead added: “I found that a tasty piece of Davidstow Cheddar has tempted at least 15 mice into my mousetrap this year.” Expert 0, lay people 2.

There is, however, no escape from the long reach of the expert. The latest target is the fatties. If you are obese, you are going to explode and go blind. It’s not a matter of if, but when. And don’t think eating less will help. That’s a popular myth. The answer is to ban advertising.

Latest from Marketing Week


Access Marketing Week’s wealth of insight, analysis and opinion that will help you do your job better.

Register and receive the best content from the only UK title 100% dedicated to serving marketers' needs.

We’ll ask you just a few questions about what you do and where you work. The more we know about our visitors, the better and more relevant content we can provide for them. And, yes, knowing our audience better helps us find commercial partners too. Don't worry, we won't share your information with other parties, unless you give us permission to do so.

Register now


Our award winning editorial team (PPA Digital Brand of the Year) ask the big questions about the biggest issues on everything from strategy through to execution to help you navigate the fast moving modern marketing landscape.


From the opportunities and challenges of emerging technology to the need for greater effectiveness, from the challenge of measurement to building a marketing team fit for the future, we are your guide.


Information, inspiration and advice from the marketing world and beyond that will help you develop as a marketer and as a leader.

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3703 or email

If you are looking for our Jobs site, please click here