Yahoo! torn between Wall Street pressures and peanut butter

How bad are the problems at Yahoo!? The Web’s largest media company has seen its share price hammered this year and its chief executive Terry Semel has appeared uninspiring.

Among the most frequent criticisms of Yahoo! is that it is falling behind Google and News Corp, which have paid top dollar for the next generation of websites like MySpace and YouTube. The pressure is on for Yahoo! to do its own big dumb acquisition.

It’s now clear that investors’ frustrations are mirrored within Yahoo!. Brad Garlinghouse, a senior vice-president, gained notoriety this month after his memo about the company’s deficiencies was leaked. It was soon dubbed the "peanut butter memo" after his description of how Yahoo! spreads itself too thinly across too many areas.

The missive is full of clichés – which is apt because that lack of an independent vision is what Garlinghouse accuses his employer of. He says Yahoo! is unfocused – it should shed 20% of its staff and restructure around a few key services.

Yet News Corp and Microsoft also operate in many different areas. Google can’t diversify fast enough, though it has yet to have much success in areas like word processing or e-mail, which means it is focused on search by default.

It’s the latest reminder of the last bubble, when established media companies, racing to catch up with the market, paid large amounts for businesses with few profits or viable revenue streams.

By spreading its bets Yahoo! might be better-placed in the long-term. There are, in any case, some successes it can point to. It looks to have the edge in mobile after replacing Google as Vodafone’s search partner. New search engine technology, due early next year, could help it catch up with Google online too.

Yahoo! still doesn’t make as much money from advertising as rivals and that’s its main problem. But to make a large acquisition of a Web 2.0 company, as some are urging, won’t help much – most of those companies don’t have any idea how to monetise their audience either.

Garlinghouse’s idea of selling non-core divisions also means losing part of its key asset – its huge audience. Yahoo! would be better off doing what it already does in a smarter fashion – trying to make more money from its users, rather than making a big acquisition just to keep Wall Street happy. Whether its management team can resist the pressure is another question.

Latest from Marketing Week


Access Marketing Week’s wealth of insight, analysis and opinion that will help you do your job better.

Register and receive the best content from the only UK title 100% dedicated to serving marketers' needs.

We’ll ask you just a few questions about what you do and where you work. The more we know about our visitors, the better and more relevant content we can provide for them. And, yes, knowing our audience better helps us find commercial partners too. Don't worry, we won't share your information with other parties, unless you give us permission to do so.

Register now


Our award winning editorial team (PPA Digital Brand of the Year) ask the big questions about the biggest issues on everything from strategy through to execution to help you navigate the fast moving modern marketing landscape.


From the opportunities and challenges of emerging technology to the need for greater effectiveness, from the challenge of measurement to building a marketing team fit for the future, we are your guide.


Information, inspiration and advice from the marketing world and beyond that will help you develop as a marketer and as a leader.

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3703 or email

If you are looking for our Jobs site, please click here