Why AOL should beware of invading the affiliate’s objectivity

Perhaps the most interesting aspect of the TradeDoubler/AOL deal was that the initial $900m (£457m) bid was deemed to be undervalued – a reflection of the perceived strength of the company, the market and the concept. TradeDoubler is undoubtedly impressive – it started out with significant funding and the added benefits of remaining private while technology and management development issues were resolved “behind closed doors”. It was therefore able to come to market “fully formed”, enhancing its attractiveness.

This acquisition vindicates the power and strength of online. As with recent changes at Google, the development is indicative of a general migration towards the CPA (click-per-acquisition model) – a result of the growing interest in the affiliate sector as advertisers become aware of the low risk aspects of the pricing model. And while the notion of affiliate marketing may eventually be redefined to be more about “CPA”, which can be applied across different online channels, for the time being affiliate marketing retains and reinforces its distinct identity as a key online channel. AOL’s move recognises the importance of affiliate marketing as a crucial element of the online marketing mix, and in this sense the acquisition was essential in adding this component to AOL’s offering, enabling it to become a complete cross-channel provider.

But therein lies a possible conflict/ AOL, like Google, is a media owner. The role of an affiliate network has always been to sit between advertisers and media owner, objectively representing the interests of both. This deal means that TradeDoubler is aligning with the media owner. The conflict may be more perceived than real, as TradeDoubler will no doubt retain its own brand identity and positioning, even though some analysts say it is logical that, in due course, TradeDoubler will be merged with AOL’s Advertising.com.

There will always be a need for professional, independent, consultancy-based services for advertisers and clients. Those companies with a broad experience and expertise in delivering across many channels with varied remuneration models – those best placed to deliver a “channel-neutral consultancy” that is willing and competent enough to examine and offer diverse media options – will be best placed to take advantage of the changes being driven by the market and reflected in recent Google and AOL moves.

Christian Panayi is head of marketing at Fuel Group

Latest from Marketing Week


Access Marketing Week’s wealth of insight, analysis and opinion that will help you do your job better.

Register and receive the best content from the only UK title 100% dedicated to serving marketers' needs.

We’ll ask you just a few questions about what you do and where you work. The more we know about our visitors, the better and more relevant content we can provide for them. And, yes, knowing our audience better helps us find commercial partners too. Don't worry, we won't share your information with other parties, unless you give us permission to do so.

Register now


Our award winning editorial team (PPA Digital Brand of the Year) ask the big questions about the biggest issues on everything from strategy through to execution to help you navigate the fast moving modern marketing landscape.


From the opportunities and challenges of emerging technology to the need for greater effectiveness, from the challenge of measurement to building a marketing team fit for the future, we are your guide.


Information, inspiration and advice from the marketing world and beyond that will help you develop as a marketer and as a leader.

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3703 or email customerservices@marketingweek.com

If you are looking for our Jobs site, please click here