Simon Lane: Not satisfied enough to recommend NPS


Frederick F. Reichheld claims that you only have to ask customers one question to grow your business: “On a scale of 1 to 10, how likely is it that you would recommend our brand to a friend or colleague?” He argues that willingness to promote is a good indicator of an individual’s loyalty because in doing so they are aligning their own reputation with the brand.

Reichheld advocates analysing data collected in this way by constructing the now widespread metric of the Net Promoter Score (Promoters [scores 9 and 10] less Detractors [scores 1 to 6] = NPS). But what makes the recommend question superior to other customer experience metrics such as value for money, quality or satisfaction?

The premise is that as willingness to recommend increases then loyalty increases. However, we might also expect a similar relationship for satisfaction or indeed any other of the commonly-used customer experience metrics.

Whichever the chosen metric, there will inevitably be outliers: cases that buck the trend, such as individuals who recommend wholeheartedly but for whatever reason don’t happen to purchase again. For recommend to be the superior metric, there need to be fewer outliers than for, say, satisfaction. It is often not this straightforward – a personal recommendation of a brand is complicated by many other issues. Is the product or service relevant to your friends and family? Is it an appropriate product to recommend? Are you the type of person who is likely to recommend?

Considering these external factors, a graph depicting the recommend ratings against a business metric would be more prone to outliers than other customer experience metrics and not fewer as Reichheld argues. Further, we might expect considerable differences between industry sectors.

Despite the widespread use of the recommend question and NPS, Reichheld has not published his original data in a peer-reviewed journal, nor is there a peer-reviewed rebuttal to the many legitimate concerns that have been raised about the supposed superiority of this metric.

His 2003 Harvard Business Review article discusses it and a white paper is available on Satmetrix’s website. But nowhere are the numbers that matter presented. With so much now riding on NPS, surely it is time to see the original analysis in its entirety?

Simon Lane
Analytics director, 2CV

Latest from Marketing Week


Access Marketing Week’s wealth of insight, analysis and opinion that will help you do your job better.

Register and receive the best content from the only UK title 100% dedicated to serving marketers' needs.

We’ll ask you just a few questions about what you do and where you work. The more we know about our visitors, the better and more relevant content we can provide for them. And, yes, knowing our audience better helps us find commercial partners too. Don't worry, we won't share your information with other parties, unless you give us permission to do so.

Register now


Our award winning editorial team (PPA Digital Brand of the Year) ask the big questions about the biggest issues on everything from strategy through to execution to help you navigate the fast moving modern marketing landscape.


From the opportunities and challenges of emerging technology to the need for greater effectiveness, from the challenge of measurement to building a marketing team fit for the future, we are your guide.


Information, inspiration and advice from the marketing world and beyond that will help you develop as a marketer and as a leader.

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3703 or email

If you are looking for our Jobs site, please click here