Bouncebacks, bounce-overs and a black hole

Forget spam. Fake pills, banking scams and trojan horse viruses are a nuisance for ISPs and a minor concern for law enforcement agencies. As far as the consumer goes, it really should be a case of buyer beware. If you expect to get millions of dollars back from sharing your bank account details, you might as well leave your car and house unlocked at night as well.

But what marketers should be worried about is the way they are throwing an increased share of their budgets into a medium that has no data quality processes at all. Shifting into digital channels is happening at a time when many organisations are trying to tighten up their data governance. Just how will the absence of any standard in one channel be reconciled with those corporate guidelines?

According to MarketingSherpa, more than a third of companies increased their spending on email last year. In doing so, they are consigning an unknown proportion of those message to the ether without knowing what happens next.

Email broadcasters will tell you that bounceback is the way they manage data quality, by ensuring they strip out undelivered or returned addresses from their lists. What they do not talk about is “bounce-over” – when bulk email hits an ISP’s network and is simply fed to any available address.

This happens a lot with spam, of course, where addresses have been generated using an algorithm that creates all possible variations of an address for each stub. I regularly get emails addressed to other people whose address begins “david.e*”, regardless of what letters follow that initial.

If you think simiilar problems do not affect data from commercial email sources, then you clearly believe the reports which they draw up on your behalf, too. Talking to a data governance leader in a bank and a database marketer in a services company recently was eye-opening about just how absent data quality really is in this channel.

Every month brings a fresh set of press releases about new email appending services offering to add missing addresses to customer databases. That brings its own compliance concerns and any user should apply a forensic microscope to the origins of the addresses they choose to select.

More worryingly, there appears to be no pressure within the data industry for the creation of an email data quality standard, process or reference data set. It is not in the interest of ESPs or data owners, of course. For major brand owners, however, the current situation can not go on. Quality will out.

Latest from Marketing Week

PLEASE SIGN IN OR REGISTER. IT'S FREE, QUICK AND EASY!

Access Marketing Week’s wealth of insight, analysis and inspiration that will help you develop as a marketer and leader.

Register and receive the best content from the only title 100% dedicated to serving marketers' needs.

We’ll ask you just a few questions about what you do and where you work, so we can make Marketing Week more relevant to you.

Register now

THE BEST CONTENT

Our award winning editorial team and columnists will ask the biggest questions about the biggest issues on everything from strategy through to execution to help you navigate the fast moving modern marketing landscape.

THE BIGGEST ISSUES

From the opportunities and challenges of emerging technology to the need for greater effectiveness, from the challenge of measurement to building a marketing team fit for the future, we will be your guide.

PERSONAL AND PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT

Information, inspiration and advice from the marketing world and beyond that will help you develop as a marketer and as a leader.

Dedicated to developing your skills and helping you achieve marketing excellence. Find guidance on leadership, professional development and the latest industry jobs.

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3711 or email subscriptions@marketingweek.com

If you are looking for our Jobs site, please click here