Money’s tight but the Government should play the long game

The World Cup brings with it both joy and exasperation for fans of the participating nations as dreams are made and dashed. As the tournament progresses, some direct marketers also have reason to despair and cheer, although not necessarily for football reasons.

Among those expressing anger could be the DM agencies on the Central Office of Information (COI) roster and those civil servants previously tasked with developing campaign materials for Government marketing activity.

The reason for their ire? Confirmation that all marketing, advertising and communication costing over £25,000 needs to match a set of criteria that would have put paid to the majority of what has been developed in recent years.

To summarise the report, unless the DM material is communicating matters of national security, corralling tax revenues or saving the nation from a public health disaster (or, puzzlingly, promoting museums) then you better have a persuasive argument for the Cabinet Office or the campaign will be black balled.

One of the criteria is that there must be “unequivocal” evidence that the campaign will “deliver measurable benefits relating directly to immediate public health and safety”.

The first half of that condition will be familiar to most direct marketers, what company would not insist on evidence of “measurable benefits” before investing. However, the need to show immediate results is a trickier sell for those producing marketing materials for the likes of the Department of Health’s three-year anti-obesity initiative, Change4Life or activity aimed at changing attitudes to drunkenness.

Those campaigns were designed to achieve long-term shifts in attitude and are therefore difficult to sell as initiatives that have immediate public health and safety benefits.

As the Prime Minister and Chancellor have been keen to point out of late, the need for austerity is unprecedented but the Government should not lose sight of the benefits of long-game public health campaigns such as Change4Life that might not swell the Treasury’s coffers right now but will lessen the burden of obesity and cost to the NHS in years to come.

On a lighter note, here is one of those reasons to be cheerful I promised you, although the sunny side might not be immediately apparent.

Last week, the Fundraising Standards Board announced that the most complained about issue made about charities last year was about direct mail sent.

Not the bummer it appears to be as this represents just 3 in every 100,000 contacts made. Proof positive of better targeting? Undoubtedly a factor.

Now, come on England!

Latest from Marketing Week


Access Marketing Week’s wealth of insight, analysis and opinion that will help you do your job better.

Register and receive the best content from the only UK title 100% dedicated to serving marketers' needs.

We’ll ask you just a few questions about what you do and where you work. The more we know about our visitors, the better and more relevant content we can provide for them. And, yes, knowing our audience better helps us find commercial partners too. Don't worry, we won't share your information with other parties, unless you give us permission to do so.

Register now


Our award winning editorial team (PPA Digital Brand of the Year) ask the big questions about the biggest issues on everything from strategy through to execution to help you navigate the fast moving modern marketing landscape.


From the opportunities and challenges of emerging technology to the need for greater effectiveness, from the challenge of measurement to building a marketing team fit for the future, we are your guide.


Information, inspiration and advice from the marketing world and beyond that will help you develop as a marketer and as a leader.

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3703 or email

If you are looking for our Jobs site, please click here