Mark Ritson’s response to cover story ‘Actions speak louder than logos’

I am honoured to have sparked such a vibrant and open debate within the pages of Marketing Week on the merits of repositioning and rebranding. But let¹s be careful with our terminology ­ the two concepts mean very different things. In a rebrand the company changes both the identity and positioning of the brand ­ for example BP, Yodel or Consignia. In repositioning the identity stays the same, but the marketer tries to change the things that the consumer associates with the brand ­ for example Bernard Matthews or HMV.


I have been asked several times by clients to help them either rebrand or reposition their brands. Each time I have tried everything in my power to dissuade them from the task. I explain that the vast majority of brands are fixed to their original positions by consumer memory, core competence and brand heritage. I challenge the managers to explain why they are in such a hurry to impose their own agenda onto a brand that usually existed within the business long before them. Then I try to introduce them to a third option ­ brand revitalisation.

Brand revitalisation is a two-step process. First go and find out what your brand¹s intended, original positioning was. Use historical archives. Use interviews with the founder of the brand. Visit the original home of the brand. Talk to the original consumers who have adored the brand since its inception and ask them why they first loved it. Boil all this down to the core DNA of the brand. Don¹t change it. Don¹t modify it. Just humbly decode and articulate it.

Then re-interpret this original positioning for 2010. The great paradox of branding is that to be consistent to a position a brand must keep changing. What sexy meant in 1970 is very different from 2010. And yet if a brand is to retain that association across the decades it must alter its tactics, product mix and communication. Not because it is changing its positioning, but because it is trying to stay true to it.

You cannot call yourself a brand manager until you visit the places, people and period in which the brand was born. If more marketers did, they would be much more reticent to attempt brand repositioning and the inherent arrogant ignorance for the past that it inevitably entails. Rather than focusing on a few brands that have successfully changed their spots, let¹s instead list the great brands that have stayed leopards through the constant revitalisation of an unchanging core position. Instead of O2, Bernard Matthews and HMV – let us speak of Chanel, Heinz, Rolex and the BBC.

And let us also speak about respect. Respect for heritage. For provenance. For authenticity. And for brands.

Latest from Marketing Week


Access Marketing Week’s wealth of insight, analysis and opinion that will help you do your job better.

Register and receive the best content from the only UK title 100% dedicated to serving marketers' needs.

We’ll ask you just a few questions about what you do and where you work. The more we know about our visitors, the better and more relevant content we can provide for them. And, yes, knowing our audience better helps us find commercial partners too. Don't worry, we won't share your information with other parties, unless you give us permission to do so.

Register now


Our award winning editorial team (PPA Digital Brand of the Year) ask the big questions about the biggest issues on everything from strategy through to execution to help you navigate the fast moving modern marketing landscape.


From the opportunities and challenges of emerging technology to the need for greater effectiveness, from the challenge of measurement to building a marketing team fit for the future, we are your guide.


Information, inspiration and advice from the marketing world and beyond that will help you develop as a marketer and as a leader.

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3703 or email

If you are looking for our Jobs site, please click here