New channel, but a 1980s mentality

Wow, isn’t the new age of digital marketing so exciting for the data professional? Loads of new metrics, types of data, volumes of instantaneous customer numerical and textual sound bites to store, manipulate, masticate over and hopefully provide actionable insight upon.

But the biggest barrier to real insight and connectivity of customer information I can see is the people often commissioned by advertisers to create the vehicle to allow the opportunity to collect this valuable information. Data which could be a goldmine for clients, but turns out to be a shallow pool of soggy mud.

What type of people set-up short term customer data collection mechanisms, beautifully designed and constructed to create a myopic view of the consumer’s life? What type of people only see one dimension of customer analysis, that of macro level reports from Google Analytics? What people only see what they do in isolation from other activity and the possibility that the response to their micro site is the cumulative effect of a multitude of touch-points and possibly years of brand equity? What type of people often see the detailed data they collect on behalf of the client as a throwaway by-product and someone else’s problem at best?

The people I am referring to are those digital agencies who claim to be only “creative”. And there are hundreds of so-called agencies, abusing their position of customer data custodians. They act like 1980’s sales promotion agencies, who used to collect response from off-the-page ads and then use the response coupon as the product delivery label, without bothering to capture the names and addresses of the response device.

So many boutique digital agencies seem not to be even mildly interested in the concept of database marketing, single customer views and basic customer analysis. These new agencies need to stop being arrogant and stating they are the new wave of media and grasp the axioms of customer data and their responsibility to the client to use data wisely.

Even if the ethical position of advising the client correctly does not wash with these people, then commercially it would make their position with the client far better as they stop being just creative and become strategic. End of rant.

By Huw Davis, managing director, Huw Davis Partnership

Latest from Marketing Week


Access Marketing Week’s wealth of insight, analysis and opinion that will help you do your job better.

Register and receive the best content from the only UK title 100% dedicated to serving marketers' needs.

We’ll ask you just a few questions about what you do and where you work. The more we know about our visitors, the better and more relevant content we can provide for them. And, yes, knowing our audience better helps us find commercial partners too. Don't worry, we won't share your information with other parties, unless you give us permission to do so.

Register now


Our award winning editorial team (PPA Digital Brand of the Year) ask the big questions about the biggest issues on everything from strategy through to execution to help you navigate the fast moving modern marketing landscape.


From the opportunities and challenges of emerging technology to the need for greater effectiveness, from the challenge of measurement to building a marketing team fit for the future, we are your guide.


Information, inspiration and advice from the marketing world and beyond that will help you develop as a marketer and as a leader.

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3703 or email

If you are looking for our Jobs site, please click here