The YouGov take: public services

Better the devil you know: Tim Britton, chief executive of UK YouGov, talks about public services.

If Apple can get thousands of people to queue all night for the latest igadget, could it persuade smokers to quit? Could McDonald’s encourage people to have their five a day? Could top brands have a significant role to play in public policy?

YouGov’s PublicIndex tracks the performance of public services and BrandIndex tracks consumer brands. The data shows that many brands are viewed more favourably than the government. Taking the government’s healthy living campaign Change4Life as an example, we see that its national sponsors have a much higher impression rating than its sponsoring government department. An impression rating is the net score of people who think positively about a brand minus those who think negatively (scale of +/- 100).

  • The Department of Health (DH) has an impression score of 2.

By comparison:

  • Mars has a score of 78
  • McCain’s score is 58
  • Asda and Tesco both have a score of 48
  • Pepsi’s score is 32

The pattern is similar when we look at other indicators such as reputation, value and consumer buzz. So if brands are more trusted than government and more effective influencers, why not give them a more prominent role in delivering government policy?

The issue is that it is likely the Change4Life partners outscore the DH because they are providing consumer goods and services. They are not making decisions about where the health budget should be spent. These are hard, often unpopular, decisions where there are winners and losers. And herein lies the rub. The Change4Life partner brands score well within the context of their own markets. Once they become more associated with public policy the context is altogether different and there is a danger that they might find that their BrandIndex scores move closer to those of government departments.

The Cultural Dictionary defines guilt by association as: “The attribution of guilt because of the people or organisations with which they associate, rather than because of any crime that they have committed.” To avoid such associations, the questions that brand owners operating in the area of public goods need answers to are:

  • What association, if any, is there with wider government policy?
  • Do consumers understand, and credit, the brand role?
  • Would traditional, commercial brand opportunities provide a more secure ROI?

The private sector clearly has a positive role to play in public life, but brand equity, so expensively built up, must be used carefully in these
public spaces.

Latest from Marketing Week


Access Marketing Week’s wealth of insight, analysis and opinion that will help you do your job better.

Register and receive the best content from the only UK title 100% dedicated to serving marketers' needs.

We’ll ask you just a few questions about what you do and where you work. The more we know about our visitors, the better and more relevant content we can provide for them. And, yes, knowing our audience better helps us find commercial partners too. Don't worry, we won't share your information with other parties, unless you give us permission to do so.

Register now


Our award winning editorial team (PPA Digital Brand of the Year) ask the big questions about the biggest issues on everything from strategy through to execution to help you navigate the fast moving modern marketing landscape.


From the opportunities and challenges of emerging technology to the need for greater effectiveness, from the challenge of measurement to building a marketing team fit for the future, we are your guide.


Information, inspiration and advice from the marketing world and beyond that will help you develop as a marketer and as a leader.

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3703 or email

If you are looking for our Jobs site, please click here