Marketing in search of the absolute

Trust is such a key component of customer relationships that you would imagine brands do everything possible to achieve a state of certainty. Verifying the identity of each customer seems like an obvious starting point. Providing completely accurate product details ought to be another component.


Yet two recent news stories suggest much of what marketing does is relative, rather than absolute. Last week saw the release of figures for the opt-out rate on the Edited Electoral Register. For the last decade, the growing number of consumers choosing to withhold their personal information from marketing use when registering to vote has soared and is only now reaching a plateau.

The implications of that rise have been to limit the confidence marketers can have in a customer’s identity. Electoral Register data can be trusted, but if nearly half of it is missing, you have to look elsewhere. Commercial data owners have become very good at mixing data sources to make up for this absence. Yet there is always the element of doubt as to whether somebody is who they say they are.

Product data has not troubled marketers too much outside of the sphere of promotional marketing. Mobile apps are changing all that. With consumers increasingly scanning product bar codes in order to compare prices, brands need to know how accurate the information being sent to a mobile phone through these apps really is.

Before you commit to a price match, do you know it is an identical product of the same size, colour and features being offered elsewhere? A study this week revealed the shocking news that less than one in ten products scanned using generic mobile apps were accurately identified. For three quarters of scans, these apps provided no information at all.

That might be helpful if it dilutes the amount of price discounting required instore. Where it becomes of real concern is if those consumers were checking for things that are contra-indicated by a health condition. Imagine a peanut allergy sufferer scanning your product and being told by an app that it is clear for them to eat when in fact it does contain nuts.

In the explosive market for apps, much of the data being used can not be traced back to a reliable source. Manufacturers tightly control how they distribute and manage their product data. But there is an army of home bloggers who can capture a bar code and do their own data entry, for example. If the revenues are there, Chinese data capture becomes viable, but is no more authentic.

So the arrival of trusted data sources is to be welcomed and should get every support from the marketing industry. Before you push your products out through a mobile app, just ask yourself if you can be absolutely certain the data being used is accurate.

Latest from Marketing Week


Access Marketing Week’s wealth of insight, analysis and opinion that will help you do your job better.

Register and receive the best content from the only UK title 100% dedicated to serving marketers' needs.

We’ll ask you just a few questions about what you do and where you work. The more we know about our visitors, the better and more relevant content we can provide for them. And, yes, knowing our audience better helps us find commercial partners too. Don't worry, we won't share your information with other parties, unless you give us permission to do so.

Register now


Our award winning editorial team (PPA Digital Brand of the Year) ask the big questions about the biggest issues on everything from strategy through to execution to help you navigate the fast moving modern marketing landscape.


From the opportunities and challenges of emerging technology to the need for greater effectiveness, from the challenge of measurement to building a marketing team fit for the future, we are your guide.


Information, inspiration and advice from the marketing world and beyond that will help you develop as a marketer and as a leader.

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3703 or email

If you are looking for our Jobs site, please click here