My response to Mark Ritson

Read Mark Ritson’s scathing column on what he dubs “the seven dumbest sins of social media” here


Columnist Mark Ritson is spending this week and next explaining in his own inimitable fashion why your investment in social media is a total waste of your marketing budget.

Regular readers may be familiar with his thoughts on the matter but to his credit he’s found a fresh and insightful way of illustrating his view. Next week, he promises a column that only he could have named The Five Most Piss-Poor Social Media Campaigns.

His piece this week makes some important points but I disagree with his hostility and suspicion towards the value of social media to a marketer.

Facebook and Twitter are nothing less than global warehouses of consumer sentiment and data. Google+ will inevitably affect Google’s search algorithm when it gains real scale.

But all three of these social networks are still in their infancy. We’re still finding new ways for them to add relevance to our lives as users. The fact that brands haven’t yet figured out how best to exploit social media channels is no reason to rule them out as valuable to marketers just yet.

I used this column three weeks ago to warn Facebook that it must remain useful in order to maintain its powerful scale and pointed to its shrewd Big Brother deal with Endemol and Channel 5 as a shining example of the site moving in the right direction.

This week Twitter has demonstrated that it too recognises the need to grow up and get useful to the brands that could one day offer a way of monetising the business if they can find ways of advertising without intruding. Hiring marketers to explore opportunities for brands through social marketing is Twitter committing to being more than just a fad.

Ritson has little evidence of scalable success to offer because it is yet to come. It was not Twitter’s job to be commercially valuable until now. It was Twitter’s job to become useful to us, its users. It was Twitter’s job to grow and grow it has, not only in number but in immense power. Don’t let any commentators tell you that News Corp getting found out had nothing to do with social media. The closure of the News of the World wouldn’t have happened five years ago.

Rupert Murdoch has broken unions and owned governments the world over for decades. Nothing moved him until now, with the volume of disgusted voices over social media finally bending his will.

Ritson reckons marketers placing shiny toys above ROI are open to accusations of malpractice. I reckon any marketer not bothering to at least investigate the use and evolution of social media could be accused of something similar.

Mark Choueke, editor

Latest from Marketing Week


Access Marketing Week’s wealth of insight, analysis and opinion that will help you do your job better.

Register and receive the best content from the only UK title 100% dedicated to serving marketers' needs.

We’ll ask you just a few questions about what you do and where you work. The more we know about our visitors, the better and more relevant content we can provide for them. And, yes, knowing our audience better helps us find commercial partners too. Don't worry, we won't share your information with other parties, unless you give us permission to do so.

Register now


Our award winning editorial team (PPA Digital Brand of the Year) ask the big questions about the biggest issues on everything from strategy through to execution to help you navigate the fast moving modern marketing landscape.


From the opportunities and challenges of emerging technology to the need for greater effectiveness, from the challenge of measurement to building a marketing team fit for the future, we are your guide.


Information, inspiration and advice from the marketing world and beyond that will help you develop as a marketer and as a leader.

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3703 or email

If you are looking for our Jobs site, please click here