Overload puts email at risk

Electronic direct mail has time, technology and trends on its side so why is it that consumers are increasingly rejecting the channel?

Russell Parsons

A study by email marketing consultants Return Path found that deliverability rates fell to 83% in the second-half of 2011. Mail delivered to a user’s SPAM folder increased to 7%, the study found, while missing or blocked email reached 10% of all mail sent.

So, to put in another way, almost 20% of all emails being sent are never received, while one in ten went missing.

The inefficiencies are not confined to the UK either. Global deliverability rates fell to 76.5% in the period, falling below 80% for the first time in several years.

Return Path of course, as deliverability consultants, have some vested interest in presenting statistics as difficulties. Cynicism aside and accepting the robustness of the study’s methodology (1.1 million campaigns were studied worldwide over the six months to 31 December), it does demonstrate the growing problems and the challenge for acceptance email marketers face.

One problem, Return Path argues, stems from internet service providers (ISPs) employing what it terms “reputation metrics” – engagement level and trusted subscriber data, for example – that are unavailable to many marketers and mean that emails are being rejected before seen by consumers.

It is not such technological minutiae, all of which can be overcome, which could derail the plans of marketers, however. The biggest threat comes from overloading previously receptive customers.

Too many companies are sending too many emails.

A customer agreeing to receive further information does not offer brands an excuse to overload consumers with an avalanche of messages. At best, messages will be deleted without being read, at worst the sender will be labeled as a spammer, marked as one and have zero opportunity to get their message across by email.

In turn, an email labeled as SPAM will further reduce delivery rates and offer companies a reason to look at other marketing channels for communications after concluding email is inefficient and rubs consumers up the wrong way.

Email is an efficient, cost effective way of sending marketing messages. Companies should be wary of allowing the opportunities it presents become a threat.

Latest from Marketing Week


Access Marketing Week’s wealth of insight, analysis and opinion that will help you do your job better.

Register and receive the best content from the only UK title 100% dedicated to serving marketers' needs.

We’ll ask you just a few questions about what you do and where you work. The more we know about our visitors, the better and more relevant content we can provide for them. And, yes, knowing our audience better helps us find commercial partners too. Don't worry, we won't share your information with other parties, unless you give us permission to do so.

Register now


Our award winning editorial team (PPA Digital Brand of the Year) ask the big questions about the biggest issues on everything from strategy through to execution to help you navigate the fast moving modern marketing landscape.


From the opportunities and challenges of emerging technology to the need for greater effectiveness, from the challenge of measurement to building a marketing team fit for the future, we are your guide.


Information, inspiration and advice from the marketing world and beyond that will help you develop as a marketer and as a leader.

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3711 or email subscriptions@marketingweek.com

If you are looking for our Jobs site, please click here