JTI plain cigs packs ad stubbed out

A national press campaign as part of Benson & Hedges owner JTI’s lobbying efforts to prevent cigarettes in the UK being sold in plain packaging has been banned for making “misleading” claims about the Government’s stance on the matter.

JTI Plain Cigarette Packs

JTI’s campaign aimed to raise consumer awareness around the Department of Health’s consultation into the use of plain packaging last year. It included three separate pieces of creative (pictured below), all referring to a 2008 consultation on plain cigarette packs. The ads claimed the Government “rejected” the proposals at the time due to “no credible evidence” moving to adopt plain tobacco packaging would prevent people taking up smoking, particularly young people.

The ads prompted complaints from Cancer Research UK and ASH (Action on Smoking and Health), which said the claim was “misleading” and could not be substantiated.

JTI said following the 2008 “Consultation on the Future of Tobacco Control” the Government decided to take forward proposals in its Health Bill for a ban on the display of tobacco products at point of sale and a ban on the sale of cigarettes from vending machines – but did not take forward proposals for plain packs.

The company, which also owns the Camel and Silk Cut brands, asserted it was therefore clear a proposal for plain packaging of cigarettes was “rejected” in 2008 and added other bodies had accepted this was the case – including ASH, which stated in 2010 tobacco companies “saw off proposals to require plain packaging before the Health Bill reached Parliament”.

The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) acknowledged the evidence presented by JTI but also considered the word “rejected” implied a “stronger and more definitive action” taken by the Government than appeared to be the case and that some of the quotes from ministers provided could be interpreted differently.

The regulator contacted the Department of Health to clarify the Government’s position, which stated while the proposal was not pursued in the new legislation introduced in 2008, the Government had kept open the potential for it to be considered at a later date and had committed to keeping the position under active review.

The ASA concluded the claims in the ads gave a “misleading impression” of the position and action taken at that time by the Government and the evidence provided by JTI was “not conclusive”.

A JTI spokesman told Marketing Week: “JTI disagrees with the ASA’s decision. Whilst we will not run the advertisements again we are considering our options.”

JTI Plain Cigarette Packs
JTI Plain Cigarette Packs
JTI Plain Cigarette Packs

Latest from Marketing Week


Access Marketing Week’s wealth of insight, analysis and opinion that will help you do your job better.

Register and receive the best content from the only UK title 100% dedicated to serving marketers' needs.

We’ll ask you just a few questions about what you do and where you work. The more we know about our visitors, the better and more relevant content we can provide for them. And, yes, knowing our audience better helps us find commercial partners too. Don't worry, we won't share your information with other parties, unless you give us permission to do so.

Register now


Our award winning editorial team (PPA Digital Brand of the Year) ask the big questions about the biggest issues on everything from strategy through to execution to help you navigate the fast moving modern marketing landscape.


From the opportunities and challenges of emerging technology to the need for greater effectiveness, from the challenge of measurement to building a marketing team fit for the future, we are your guide.


Information, inspiration and advice from the marketing world and beyond that will help you develop as a marketer and as a leader.

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3703 or email customerservices@marketingweek.com

If you are looking for our Jobs site, please click here