Urban Outfitters rapped over “F*** my liver” ad

An ad by Urban Outfitters that drew attention to a “F*** my liver” hip flask for sale on its site has been banned by the advertising watchdog over concerns it portrayed drinking alcohol as a challenge, while GiffGaff has also been rapped for its “offensive and distressing” Halloween online ad campaign.

Urban Outfitter’s hip flask ad has been banned.

The Urban Outfitters website stated “Drink like the rebel you are with this F*** My Liver Hip Flask”, while text on the product itself said “F*** MY LIVER”. A complaint questioned whether the site was being irresponsible because it could encourage excessive drinking.

Urban Outfitters said it was its intention to produce a funny and light-hearted ad to attract the attention of consumers that reflected its “street style” attitude. The retailer said it did not encourage drinking or disregard for health and pointed out it does not sell alcohol beverages.

However, the Advertising Standards Authority found a “strong link” to alcohol consumption between the purpose of a hip flask and the reference to “liver” and said the phrase contained a message to actively disregard well-known health advice. It banned the ad from appearing in its current form again and told Urban Outfitters not to use words or phrases that portrayed drinking as a challenge again.

Meanwhile, GiffGaff’s “Different Takes Guts” online video ad campaign has also been banned after the ASA found it was “offensive and distressing”. The ad showed people dressed in white, jumping into an empty swimming pool before being covered in blood, guts and bodily organs.

GiffGaff said it did produce the ads with a “sense of responsibility” and that the ads had been created to celebrate Halloween by taking a humorous rather than frightening look at how being different “takes guts”. They also said it was targeted at those aged over 18 and by keyword interests such as “horror” and “scary movies”.

The watchdog ruled that while the ad did appear around Halloween, it was shown before videos on YouTube not related to Halloween and did not contain any warning about the ad’s content, nor was it age-gated. It said the images were sufficiently realistic to cause “offence and distress”, particularly to children, and therefore banned the ad.

Latest from Marketing Week


Access Marketing Week’s wealth of insight, analysis and opinion that will help you do your job better.

Register and receive the best content from the only UK title 100% dedicated to serving marketers' needs.

We’ll ask you just a few questions about what you do and where you work. The more we know about our visitors, the better and more relevant content we can provide for them. And, yes, knowing our audience better helps us find commercial partners too. Don't worry, we won't share your information with other parties, unless you give us permission to do so.

Register now


Our award winning editorial team (PPA Digital Brand of the Year) ask the big questions about the biggest issues on everything from strategy through to execution to help you navigate the fast moving modern marketing landscape.


From the opportunities and challenges of emerging technology to the need for greater effectiveness, from the challenge of measurement to building a marketing team fit for the future, we are your guide.


Information, inspiration and advice from the marketing world and beyond that will help you develop as a marketer and as a leader.

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3703 or email customerservices@marketingweek.com

If you are looking for our Jobs site, please click here