Industry action on spam texts needs to be underpinned by statutory teeth

It’s taken a long-time but this week I finally became a victim of spam texters and nuisance callers.

Russell Parsons

On Tuesday, two texts about reclaiming mis-sold PPI and Wednesday a robo-call about claiming damages for an accident I have not had. 

And you know what, it is bloody annoying. Not only annoying but also plain stupid. I know it’s low cost but really, does anyone ever bite? 

Someone, somewhere must do otherwise the companies behind the texts and calls wouldn’t bother. 

Action to consign offenders to the dustbin of marketing history is been taken by regulators and self-regulatory bodies. 

Last week mobile operators trade association GSMA announced it has developed a Spam reporting service with its biggest constituents – O2, EE, Three and Vodafone – and the Information Commissioner’s Office. 

Victims of spam are encouraged to forward them to the service, which allows operators to take action against the senders.

Interestingly, those involved are said to be preparing to extend the reporting service to nuisance calls. 

For its part, the ICO slammed the practices of two telemarketing companies in the North West last week for making nuisance calls. 

As welcome as measures like those taken by the GSMA et al are they lack the teeth that action emanating from Westminster would possess. 

According to the timetable of many in the direct marketing space, a Government consultation on making nuisance call regulation easier to enforce as well as changes to consent rules was due in January so it could now be considered late. 

Priorities change on a regular basis in the corridors of power but people’s level of anger about receiving spam texts and calls does not. 

If you could allow for wild speculation for a moment, could it be that action is being delayed until closer to the General Election for The Conservatives to achieve maximum vote-winning impact? 

After all, if ministers convinced themselves reducing bingo tax was a vote winner then it shouldn’t be too hard to imagine the electoral impact of a hot button topic like nuisance calls. 

Whether it is deliberate delay or the victim of parliamentary machinery, a sense of urgency needs to be employed.

As pointless and annoying as spam texters and nuisance callers are, they are nothing if not resourceful. Voluntary initiatives and stern words are fantastic and to be applauded but stronger Government action is also needed. 

Latest from Marketing Week

NOT REGISTERED? IT'S FREE, QUICK AND EASY!

Access Marketing Week’s wealth of insight, analysis and opinion that will help you do your job better.

Register and receive the best content from the only UK title 100% dedicated to serving marketers' needs.

We’ll ask you just a few questions about what you do and where you work. The more we know about our visitors, the better and more relevant content we can provide for them. And, yes, knowing our audience better helps us find commercial partners too. Don't worry, we won't share your information with other parties, unless you give us permission to do so.

Register now

THE BEST CONTENT

Our award winning editorial team (PPA Digital Brand of the Year) ask the big questions about the biggest issues on everything from strategy through to execution to help you navigate the fast moving modern marketing landscape.

THE BIGGEST ISSUES

From the opportunities and challenges of emerging technology to the need for greater effectiveness, from the challenge of measurement to building a marketing team fit for the future, we are your guide.

PERSONAL AND PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT

Information, inspiration and advice from the marketing world and beyond that will help you develop as a marketer and as a leader.

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3703 or email customerservices@marketingweek.com

If you are looking for our Jobs site, please click here