Paddy Power’s Pistorius ad hits brand perception but not sales

The controversy over Paddy Power’s advert encouraging people to bet on the outcome of Oscar Pistorius’ murder trial has negatively impacted perception of the bookmakers’ brand but it has also significantly increased awareness of its name and advertising and has yet to have any impact on people’s plans to bet with the firm, according to the latest brand tracking data.

Paddy Power has been criticised for encouraging people to place bets on a murder trial.

The Advertising Standards Authority took the unusual step of withdrawing the ad after it attracted more than 5,000 complaints in the 3 days following its 2 March launch from people that accused it of being offensive. 

Data from YouGov’s BrandIndex shows its Buzz score, a balance of the positive and negative things people have heard about the brand, has slid to -5.6 from -0.4 the day before the ad launched, a drop considered “statistically significant” by YouGov.

The coverage of the ad has also, however, increased awareness of the brand’s advertising over the period, with BrandIndex’s ”ad awareness” rating increasing 3.8 points to 13.2 in the period. The controversy has also lifted “word of mouth exposure” of the Paddy Power name in the period. 

Both increases were rated “statistically significant” by BrandIndex.

Of greatest significance to Paddy Power is BrandIndex’s ”purchase intent” rating with no obvious ill effects from the controversy yet. The bookmaker’s ranking has dropped slightly and not by an amount seen as significant.

The gambling firm’s press ad promised a ”money back if he walks” offer for bets on the outcome of the athlete’s trial, which started Monday (3 March). The ad, which ran at the weekend (2 March), was designed to tap into buzz around that night’s Oscars as well as the trial and featured an image of Pistorius mocked up as an Academy Award statue with the slogan ”It’s Oscar Time”.

A spokeswoman for Paddy Power was characteristically unrepentant in response to the ASA’s decision to pull the ad and that it had overtaken a 2005 KFC ad to become the most complained about ad ever. “In your face, KFC”, a spokeswoman said.

The brand is no stranger to controversy and appears to relish it. Previous efforts include an ad that showed a blind footballer kicking a cat into a tree, which topped 2010’s most complained about list, and a 2012 spot that showed “chavs” being shot by tranquiliser darts

Latest from Marketing Week


Access Marketing Week’s wealth of insight, analysis and opinion that will help you do your job better.

Register and receive the best content from the only UK title 100% dedicated to serving marketers' needs.

We’ll ask you just a few questions about what you do and where you work. The more we know about our visitors, the better and more relevant content we can provide for them. And, yes, knowing our audience better helps us find commercial partners too. Don't worry, we won't share your information with other parties, unless you give us permission to do so.

Register now


Our award winning editorial team (PPA Digital Brand of the Year) ask the big questions about the biggest issues on everything from strategy through to execution to help you navigate the fast moving modern marketing landscape.


From the opportunities and challenges of emerging technology to the need for greater effectiveness, from the challenge of measurement to building a marketing team fit for the future, we are your guide.


Information, inspiration and advice from the marketing world and beyond that will help you develop as a marketer and as a leader.

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3703 or email

If you are looking for our Jobs site, please click here