“Ban the word mum from segmentation: there is no identikit person”

If you’re a regular reader of Marketing Week, you’ll probably be able to spot that I am female. You may not be aware that I am also a mother.

Because although it’s a very important role for me when it comes to parenting my children, it’s not one that defines me. I could equally be defined by my career, education, location, income, friendships, attitudes or multicultural background.

So why do advertisers believe that ‘mums’ are a homogeneous group? Just 19 per cent of mothers in the UK believe there are any examples of mothers in advertising that they can relate to, according to research with more than 800 consumers from parenting forum Mumsnet and Saatchi & Saatchi.

You might say that marketing often uses blunt personas to extrapolate beliefs about all consumer groups. But this is a collection of 18 million people with an estimated spending power of £1.9bn. So getting it right should matter to brands.

There are five core myths about marketing to mothers, according to the research, which you can read here. What is interesting about this particular study is that it tells us that brands are getting everything wrong: the segmentation of the group; the attitudes of the group; and the content of the advertising.

There are two stereotypes in particular that grate, according to the research: the perfect parenting specimens who have it all and need to be wonderful at everything; and frazzled, stressed women lumbered with incompetent, bumbling husbands. Women simply don’t recognise these profiles.

“Beyond the early days of a child’s birth, mothers are far more divided than they are united,” explains the study. It calls for companies to examine the way they approach this group and work out how to approach them better.

With just 23 per cent of mothers happy for anyone apart from their children to call them mum, it’s clear that mothers are asking marketers to stop lumping their experiences together. After all, what is being marketed to ‘mums’ is often being marketed to people who happen to have children. If you’re selling me baby yoghurts, it’s worth appealing to me as a mother. If you’re selling me mascara, my parental status simply doesn’t matter.

The research suggests that marketing departments should go cold turkey on using the word ‘mum’ at all. “Ban it as an audience definition. Refuse to accept it on a creative brief,” argues the study. Done that? Good – now it’s over to you.

Hide Comments1 Show Comment
  • Richard Tovey 21 Aug 2016 at 1:43 pm

    Lost interest in this.

    You start by saying that 77% of mothers dont like to be called mum by people outside the family and then you spend the whole time calling them mums.

  • Post a comment

Latest from Marketing Week


Access Marketing Week’s wealth of insight, analysis and opinion that will help you do your job better.

Register and receive the best content from the only UK title 100% dedicated to serving marketers' needs.

We’ll ask you just a few questions about what you do and where you work. The more we know about our visitors, the better and more relevant content we can provide for them. And, yes, knowing our audience better helps us find commercial partners too. Don't worry, we won't share your information with other parties, unless you give us permission to do so.

Register now


Our award winning editorial team (PPA Digital Brand of the Year) ask the big questions about the biggest issues on everything from strategy through to execution to help you navigate the fast moving modern marketing landscape.


From the opportunities and challenges of emerging technology to the need for greater effectiveness, from the challenge of measurement to building a marketing team fit for the future, we are your guide.


Information, inspiration and advice from the marketing world and beyond that will help you develop as a marketer and as a leader.

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3703 or email customerservices@marketingweek.com

If you are looking for our Jobs site, please click here