Pro-smoking group fails to stub out NHS smoke free ad

A pro-smoking group has failed in its attempt to get the long-running NHS “smoke free” TV ad campaign banned by the advertising watchdog.

Video: NHS “Smoke Free” TV ad


brightcove.createExperiences();

Forest (The Freedom Organisation For The Right To Enjoy Smoking Tobacco) said the ad, which features a growth appearing on a cigarette and increasing in size as a man smokes it, was misleading.

The pressure group, alongside 18 other individuals, complained the voiceover claim that “when you smoke, the chemicals you inhale cause mutations in your body and mutations are how cancer starts. Every 15 cigarettes you smoke will cause a mutation. If you could see the damage you’d stop” could not be substantiated.

The Department of Health said the claim was based on published, peer-reviewed scientific papers from “well respected sources” and supplied the relevant papers to the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) for its investigation.

Broadcast clearing body Clearcast had also initially queried the “one mutation per 15 cigarettes smoked” claim because it had believed it was too specific. However, it said its consultant was later convinced of its accuracy after reviewing two studies with a large pool of participants and approved the script.

The ASA took expert advice alongside reviewing the studies submitted by the Department of Health and found the average number of mutations per cigarette smoked was significantly higher than the 15 suggested in the ad.

The watchdog concluded that because the ad made a conservative claim, which was supported by evidence, it was substantiated and unlikely to mislead viewers.

Forest is seeking an independent review of the “baffling” ruling. It says its complaint was originally upheld by the ASA’s executive team three times over the course of the 18-month investigation which were challenged by the Department of Health, but that the ASA council [which is independent of the advertising industry and adjudicates complaints] took the opposite decision.

Simon Clark, director of Forest, says: ”The decision is inexplicable. Not only have ASA council members ignored the advice of their own executive, they have effectively rejected the report of an independent expert commissioned to advise the ASA on this complex issue.

“The Department of Health did everything it could to derail our complaint and were given every opportunity to do so. Despite this the ASA executive upheld our complaint three times. That speaks volumes.”

Latest from Marketing Week

NOT REGISTERED? IT'S FREE, QUICK AND EASY!

Access Marketing Week’s wealth of insight, analysis and opinion that will help you do your job better.

Register and receive the best content from the only UK title 100% dedicated to serving marketers' needs.

We’ll ask you just a few questions about what you do and where you work. The more we know about our visitors, the better and more relevant content we can provide for them. And, yes, knowing our audience better helps us find commercial partners too. Don't worry, we won't share your information with other parties, unless you give us permission to do so.

Register now

THE BEST CONTENT

Our award winning editorial team (PPA Digital Brand of the Year) ask the big questions about the biggest issues on everything from strategy through to execution to help you navigate the fast moving modern marketing landscape.

THE BIGGEST ISSUES

From the opportunities and challenges of emerging technology to the need for greater effectiveness, from the challenge of measurement to building a marketing team fit for the future, we are your guide.

PERSONAL AND PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT

Information, inspiration and advice from the marketing world and beyond that will help you develop as a marketer and as a leader.

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3703 or email customerservices@marketingweek.com

If you are looking for our Jobs site, please click here