How the Brexit campaigns match up

The fight between the two sides in the EU referendum is as much a battle of marketing as it is a clash of ideas.

EU Remain campaign bus

The two officially designated campaigns in the debate – Britain Stronger in Europe on one side, and Vote Leave on the other – are competing for airtime and the attention of the public through a range of marketing tactics, not all of which have proved successful so far.

PR is one of the most obvious communication channels, though both sides have courted controversy in their attempts to dominate the headlines. In March, Vote Leave published a list of murders and rapes committed by 50 EU criminals in Britain – a move that received widespread coverage but that was criticised by the ‘remain’ side as “scaremongering”. Similarly, the pro-EU camp has generated publicity by promoting economic warnings about the dangers of leaving, but faces claims from the Brexit side that it is running an overly negative campaign labelled ‘Project Fear’.

As the underdog side in the debate, according to the majority of polls, the Vote Leave camp has sought to use guerilla marketing tactics to spread its message. Earlier this year, the campaign received a warning letter from solicitors representing the artist Antony Gormley after it projected its message across his Angel of the North sculpture without permission.

The remain side, on the other hand, has the backing of the Government, which spent £9m on sending pro-EU leaflets to every UK household last month. This use of direct mail reflects the remain campaign’s desire to reach older voters, who polls suggest are more likely to be against the EU and more likely to vote. The Britain Stronger in Europe campaign also recently launched its ‘Talk to Gran’ campaign in which it is handing out pro-EU postcards to young people at universities and other locations and encouraging them to send them to their grandparents.

The campaign was mocked and called patronising by some commenters on social media, but Will Straw of Britain Stronger in Europe defended the attempt to cross the generational divide. “This referendum will not be won simply by winning the argument in the media, but by creating a bottom-up, word-of-mouth campaign that will reach voters of every age in all parts of our country,” he said.

READ MORE: What would Brexit mean for marketers?

Both campaigns came in for criticism at Advertising Week Europe last month. Lindsay Pattison, CEO of media agency Maxus, argued that neither side had made a significant impact on social media. “Britain Stronger in Europe has got something like 25,000 followers [on Twitter] and Vote Leave about 35,000,” she noted. “Both of those numbers are pretty pathetic.”

Hide Comments1 Show Comment

Latest from Marketing Week


Access Marketing Week’s wealth of insight, analysis and opinion that will help you do your job better.

Register and receive the best content from the only UK title 100% dedicated to serving marketers' needs.

We’ll ask you just a few questions about what you do and where you work. The more we know about our visitors, the better and more relevant content we can provide for them. And, yes, knowing our audience better helps us find commercial partners too. Don't worry, we won't share your information with other parties, unless you give us permission to do so.

Register now


Our award winning editorial team (PPA Digital Brand of the Year) ask the big questions about the biggest issues on everything from strategy through to execution to help you navigate the fast moving modern marketing landscape.


From the opportunities and challenges of emerging technology to the need for greater effectiveness, from the challenge of measurement to building a marketing team fit for the future, we are your guide.


Information, inspiration and advice from the marketing world and beyond that will help you develop as a marketer and as a leader.

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3703 or email

If you are looking for our Jobs site, please click here