‘Marketers invest too much in short-term sales comms’

New research suggests the marketing industry is focusing too much on the short term and that this is having a negative impact on awareness, share of voice and sales.

marketing effectiveness

Too many brands are taking a short-term view on effectiveness. That is the conclusion of a new report from the IPA released to coincide with its first Effectiveness Week.

The research, based on analysis of case studies entered into the IPA’s Effectiveness Awards, found that while the optimum campaigns have a 60:40 ratio of long-term brand building versus short-term sales activation, few campaigns are adhering to this.

On average, 47% of a comms budget is now spent on short-term activation strategies, up from 31% in 2014. But share of voice is down by 9 percentage points over a decade.

Les Binet, report author and head of effectiveness at Adam&EveDDB, says: “This latest research provides empirical evidence that our industry is focussing too much on the short term. The pendulum has swung too far in favour of brand activation, yet for truly effective advertising we must continue to invest more in long-term brand building.”

Part of the issue is the rise of owned and earned media, which has led many marketers to question the need for paid media. However, the research shows that awareness and penetration are still key in driving growth and profit; they are three times more likely to be the main driver of growth versus loyalty.

Yet it is the combination of paid, owned and earned that creates the biggest benefit. Adding owned media to a paid campaign typically increases the effectiveness of a campaign by 13%, while earned media causes a rise of 26%.

Scale is also important. Adding TV to a campaign increases effectiveness by 40%, making it the most effective medium and the one that is best at generating top-line growth that drives profit.

One reason for TV’s effectiveness is the synergy of live TV working with video-on-demand and online video. Brands will see a 54% in the average number of very large business effects by using them together, versus 32% for TV only and 25% for online video on its own.

Janet Hull, IPA director of marketing strategy explains: “Here lies the proof that the digital transformation has helped make mass media work even harder. It also proves that while it is good to have earned and owned media, for top-line growth brands must invest in paid-for, mass reach.”

Latest from Marketing Week


Access Marketing Week’s wealth of insight, analysis and opinion that will help you do your job better.

Register and receive the best content from the only UK title 100% dedicated to serving marketers' needs.

We’ll ask you just a few questions about what you do and where you work. The more we know about our visitors, the better and more relevant content we can provide for them. And, yes, knowing our audience better helps us find commercial partners too. Don't worry, we won't share your information with other parties, unless you give us permission to do so.

Register now


Our award winning editorial team (PPA Digital Brand of the Year) ask the big questions about the biggest issues on everything from strategy through to execution to help you navigate the fast moving modern marketing landscape.


From the opportunities and challenges of emerging technology to the need for greater effectiveness, from the challenge of measurement to building a marketing team fit for the future, we are your guide.


Information, inspiration and advice from the marketing world and beyond that will help you develop as a marketer and as a leader.

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3703 or email customerservices@marketingweek.com

If you are looking for our Jobs site, please click here