‘There’s no place for religion at work, apparently’

New research out this week explores the struggle that employers face over expressions of faith in the workplace, but reader comments and a Twitter poll bypass this issue and suggest religion has no place at work at all.

A study by consultancy ComRes shows that British employers are struggling to manage expressions of faith in the workplace and suggests up to a million people in Britain may have experienced workplace harassment, discrimination or bullying because of their religion or belief.

Our feature earlier this week looked at how employers can make space for religion at work and the ways faith can make a workforce more diverse.

Yet Marketing Week readers seem to have a different opinion. A number of comments underneath the article suggested people “leave religion at home” and that people “go to work to WORK”. A Twitter poll with 110 votes shows 36% think religion does not belong in the work place, 32% think it should be acknowledged and just 14% believe HR policies are needed. A further 18% literally don’t care.

I completely understand that the research doesn’t ask whether there’s a place for religion in the workplace as a starting point.

But that argument is voided by the fact that the study is grounded in the real concerns of business leaders who are trying to pre-emptively tackle the subject as part of a diversity and inclusion push. I’m not sure people who say it has no place at work have grasped that part of the research.

As an atheist with friends and colleagues of all faiths and differing beliefs I would 100% stand beside, in front of or behind them if their religion or faith caused conflict at work that led to any harassment, discrimination or bullying.

But therein lies the issue. The topic is usually raised and dealt with when there is conflict, rather than putting practises in place to avoid that clash.

This is what businesses are worried about and one of the reasons why ComRes opened its research division focusing on faith – to help companies navigate what can be a tricky subject.

One reader comment said: “Tolerance of any protected characteristic i.e. The Equality Act (2010) should be promoted. But you have to draw the line somewhere where it is fair to everyone.”

Outwardly expressing your faith and beliefs is a personal choice but so is declaring your sexuality. Does that mean there shouldn’t be practises or policies, if needed, to protect people from work-based harassment when related to sexuality, or gender, or age?

Do those things affect everyone? And would you want to work for an employer that doesn’t address all forms of work place harassment, bullying and discrimination?

Although all these areas of diversity are in themselves very diverse, with extremely different challenges and opportunities, I don’t see religion as being so far removed to not justify businesses at least starting to look at what the opportunities and risks are.

I’m with this one reader who quite simply said: “I believe that regardless of where you work, what you do or who you are, no one should ever feel ashamed of what they believe in. Faith is a key component to diversity and without that the world would be a very boring place.”

Hide Comments2 Show Comments
Comments
  • Pete Austin 7 Apr 2017 at 9:26 am

    Taking a twitter poll about religion seriously. Really???

  • Zachary Kircher 9 Apr 2017 at 7:50 am

    I think the comment about comparing sexual identity protection policies to religion is a very valid one; being one who supports religion in the workplace, I agree with the notion in truly equal treatment. I know and recognize that there are countless people who have been marginalized, and they deserve proper treatment. But there is no room in our society for double standards. All people should be respected and treated fairly if we are going to strive for the right level of tolerance in this world.

    After all, tolerance should be about accepting someone else’s beliefs and behavior, even if you don’t condone them. That goes for Christians, Muslims, Buddhists, Hindus, Atheists, and so on and so forth.

    That being said, though, I don’t want to seem like the guy who wants everyone to deal with it when someone has certain religious beliefs and they want to share them. This just goes back to fundamental elements of our Constitution which protect the freedom to exercise one’s religion according to their own dictates of conscience. This, of course, includes people who would simply choose to not believe/listen. It all just reverts back to that key principle: treat everyone fairly no matter what, because that perfect love and tolerance will be what changes the world for the best.

  • Post a comment

Latest from Marketing Week

PLEASE SIGN IN OR REGISTER. IT'S FREE, QUICK AND EASY!

Access Marketing Week’s wealth of insight, analysis and inspiration that will help you develop as a marketer and leader.

Register and receive the best content from the only title 100% dedicated to serving marketers' needs.

We’ll ask you just a few questions about what you do and where you work, so we can make Marketing Week more relevant to you.

Register now

THE BEST CONTENT

Our award winning editorial team and columnists will ask the biggest questions about the biggest issues on everything from strategy through to execution to help you navigate the fast moving modern marketing landscape.

THE BIGGEST ISSUES

From the opportunities and challenges of emerging technology to the need for greater effectiveness, from the challenge of measurement to building a marketing team fit for the future, we will be your guide.

PERSONAL AND PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT

Information, inspiration and advice from the marketing world and beyond that will help you develop as a marketer and as a leader.

Dedicated to developing your skills and helping you achieve marketing excellence. Find guidance on leadership, professional development and the latest industry jobs.

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3711 or email subscriptions@marketingweek.com

If you are looking for our Jobs site, please click here