A cross Word about Microsoft

You write that Microsoft is now placed ninth in the league of top ten global brands, as determined by Interbrand (MW November 15).

As much as I bow to the authority of Interbrand, I would take issue with their evaluation. Elsewhere in the same issue you claim that Microsoft “has been noted more for a mixture of good marketing and keen business timing than key technological advances”. I suggest that Roger Baird’s analysis is truer.

When the PC was first launched it was sold to a technically literate audience (and for the most part still is). Decisions were very often made by experienced systems personnel. Moreover, it took a relatively long time for PCs to make the transition from computing departments to other business departments. Therefore Microsoft did not make any particular effort to brand its product. Currently, the vast majority of PCs (up to 90 per cent) are supplied with Microsoft’s DOS. Larry Ellison, ceo of Oracle Computer Corporation, has commented, “One of the huge problems with the PC is that it is currently controlled by one company that has a monopoly and virtually no competition – Microsoft has a 90 per cent share of PC applications. When you are operating in a market with no competitors, you begin to do bizarre things.”

However, as a brand Microsoft means nothing – it is bereft of emotional values. Microsoft’s marketing effort is presented as cool technology involving many features, most of which are never used. It has no outstanding or distinctive attributes. Microsoft succeeds because it has a monopoly.

Therefore, according to Interbrand’s criteria, Microsoft scores high for the first, dominance of own market, but what of the other three? Could the Microsoft brand be stretched to financial services (as has been rumoured), or even related activities such as media? I think not. It is instructive to note the way that the Virgin brand has developed by contrast. On the fourth criteria, customer commitment, talk to anyone on the Web for the answer. There are numerous discussion groups dedicated to destroying Microsoft’s reputation, enormous latent and manifest resentment to its power. Perhaps Interbrand should reconsider.

Kofi Dwinfour

Director of marketing and PR

London Guildhall University

London E1

Recommended

For Richer For Poorer

Marketing Week

The UK’s poverty gap has now hit Third World proportions, driving a wedge between rich and poor. This inequality is neutering mass markets and limiting consumer growth. The challenge for marketers is to bring the poor back into the mainstream.

Interfocus scoops Loire Valley wine brief

Marketing Week

Interfocus has beaten Sopexa, Publicis and Tequila to the Loire Valley wine account, worth up to 1m. The win follows a series of moves connected to the account resulting from Lowe Howard-Spink’s purchase of through-the-line agency Interfocus and its subsequent merger with the Brompton Agency. Sopexa is a marketing consultancy for the French food and […]

Comments

    Leave a comment

    Close

    Discover even more as a subscriber

    This article is available for subscribers only.

    Sign up now for your access-all-areas pass.

    Subscribers get unlimited access to unrivalled coverage of the biggest issues in marketing and world-renowned columnists, alongside carefully curated reports and briefings from Econsultancy. Find out more.

    If you are an existing print subscriber find out how you can get access here.

    Subscribe now

    Got a question?

    Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3703 or email customerservices@marketingweek.com

    If you are looking for our Jobs site, please click here

    Subscribers get unlimited access to unrivalled coverage of the biggest issues in marketing and world-renowned columnists, alongside carefully curated reports and briefings from Econsultancy. Find out more.

    If you are an existing print subscriber find out how you can get access here.

    Subscribe now