Marketers becoming ‘paranoid’ over reliability of marketing metrics

Almost three-quarters of senior marketers believe media measurement currencies are becoming “increasingly corrupted” and that players such as Google and Facebook have too much control.

A whopping 70% of senior marketers believe media measurement currencies are becoming “increasingly corrupted”, according to the second Media2020 report by Media Sense, ISBA and IPSOS Connect.

Having surveyed more than 250 senior British marketers, the report shows nearly a quarter (23%) are “losing sleep” over recent high-profile measurement errors.

According to Andy Pearch, co-founder of MediaSense and the author of the report, marketers are becoming increasingly paranoid about the reliability of audience measurement data on digital and social channels.

“There’s paranoia because the media agencies and the big digital players have way too much control,” he tells Marketing Week. “It’s going to take a long time to move to an independent source of data verification.

“What this does show, however, is that marketers are running out of patience with the likes of Facebook and Google to sort out their advertising measurement issues. They won’t be palmed off and told to wait any more.”

Respondents also felt there had been little or no progress in industry measurement since 2015, with expected improvements to attribution and cross-device tracking “painfully slow”. The report suggests there is “disquiet” about attribution, the choice of metrics, media effectiveness measurement and open distrust of the currencies themselves. The majority believe those currencies are no longer fit for purpose.

That has also led to changes in the most important success metrics for marketers. Just 25% listed ‘engagement with social content’, down considerably from 43% in 2015. ‘Reach/frequency’, ‘share of voice’ and ‘acquisition costs’ were all down, while ROI, brand sentiment and advocacy increased.

When respondents were asked what aspect of the media industry they would most like to fix, “transparency” was the most commonly raised topic, at 47%; perhaps unsurprising in light of The Times investigation.

Pearch believes marketers will place a bigger emphasis on brand building over the coming years. He believes this will mean some of the substantial growth that’s been seen within digital advertising channels will start to slow down.

He concludes: “It could be good news for TV, print and more traditional channels. I don’t think it’s silly to expect digital growth to slow down a little.”

Just last week, the IPA and ISBA united to release new recommendations calling for marketers to defend the importance of accountable audience data that will stand up against strict independent verification.



There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. John Billett 12 Jun 2017

    Whatever happened to joint industry research co funded and independently validated? My belief is that advertisers and agencies now spend far less on media research than they used to and in that vacuum the media vendors roam around unchecked and un monitored producing their own biased version of “the truth”

    Time for advertisers and agencies to stop complaining and start spending money on bails research

  2. Fernando Nasso 12 Jun 2017

    I believe the amount of data that agencies and marketers are being bombarded at from digital, especially social channels, are hindering their abilities to choose the ‘right’ data for their own company. Also, relying on such vanity metrics will reduce marketing ROI, and that is what marketers should really be concerned about; choosing the right metrics that will show how marketing is performing to deliver revenue.

Leave a comment