‘Biased’ review of Silk Cut mag

As your article on customer magazines (MW November 17) pointed out, research is imperative to measure the impact of a publication against its objectives. A pity then that your own research led you to quote a dismissive comment (unattributed) on our Silk Cut magazine, labelling it “irrelevant and ineffective”.

From my own humble research efforts, I am given to understand that the “heavy criticism” in question originated – not from the magazine’s target audience – but from spokespersons representing one or more of my competitors. This is hardly in the best traditions of rigorous research methodology, although I empathise with the temptation to produce provocative copy.

As for findings from independent research, I can confirm, on behalf of my client, that we are delighted with the magazine’s reception from the truly important people – its readers.

William Seighart

Chairman

Forward Publishing

London W1

Comments

    Leave a comment

    Close

    Discover even more as a subscriber

    This article is available for subscribers only.

    Sign up now for your access-all-areas pass.

    Subscribers get unlimited access to unrivalled coverage of the biggest issues in marketing and world-renowned columnists, alongside carefully curated reports and briefings from Econsultancy. Find out more.

    If you are an existing print subscriber find out how you can get access here.

    Subscribe now

    Got a question?

    Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3703 or email customerservices@marketingweek.com

    If you are looking for our Jobs site, please click here

    Subscribers get unlimited access to unrivalled coverage of the biggest issues in marketing and world-renowned columnists, alongside carefully curated reports and briefings from Econsultancy. Find out more.

    If you are an existing print subscriber find out how you can get access here.

    Subscribe now