ISP’s Philip Circus replies

A little knowledge is a bad thing and this letter is the proof of it. Bartman should read the full judgment in this case. He could then see that Judge Jack QC cited with approval a number of previous cases, including Reader’s Digest v Williams (1976) and Express Newspapers v Liverpool Daily Post (1983), in which substantial numbers of people purchased products and also obtained a chance, but because there was a real choice for consumers there was no lottery. The initial report of the case in The Times certainly gave the impression that instant win mechanics might now be legally unsound. However, the full judgment makes a clear distinction based on the existence or otherwise of a genuine opportunity for consumers to choose between purchase or a free entry mechanism. That is why lawyers must now emphasise the crucial importance of such mechanisms in ensuring the continuation of an important promotional technique.

Philip Circus

Head of legal services

Institute of Sales Promotion

London N1

Comments

    Leave a comment

    Close

    Discover even more as a subscriber

    This article is available for subscribers only.

    Sign up now for your access-all-areas pass.

    Subscribers get unlimited access to unrivalled coverage of the biggest issues in marketing and world-renowned columnists, alongside carefully curated reports and briefings from Econsultancy. Find out more.

    If you are an existing print subscriber find out how you can get access here.

    Subscribe now

    Got a question?

    Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3703 or email customerservices@marketingweek.com

    If you are looking for our Jobs site, please click here

    Subscribers get unlimited access to unrivalled coverage of the biggest issues in marketing and world-renowned columnists, alongside carefully curated reports and briefings from Econsultancy. Find out more.

    If you are an existing print subscriber find out how you can get access here.

    Subscribe now