Mark Ritson: Coke is smart to simplify its designs, but that won’t save it from decline

Despite being ridiculed, Coca-Cola has made the right branding move by using its red circle logo as a visual code on the cans of all its product variants, but with fizzy drinks declining it’s no more than delaying the inevitable.


It’s very hard to launch any kind of logo redesign and not look stupidly superficial. To the credit of Coca-Cola and its global team of executives they almost got away with it last week. Repeated references to the company’s ‘One Brand’ strategy and constant mentions of Coke’s long and venerated heritage made it clear that this was a seriously important move. Coke’s Q1 global sales, also announced last week, continue to frighten investors so the company needed to do something, anything, to allay their fears.

“The unification of the brands through design marks the first time in our 130-year history that the iconic Coca-Cola visual identity has been shared across products in such a prominent way,” explained Coke’s vice president for global design James Sommerville. “When applied across packaging, retail, equipment and experiential, this new approach becomes a global design language that utilises a historical brand icon to present the range of Coca-Cola products available today in a contemporary and simple way.”

So far, the outside world remains less than enthused about the new design, which sees the iconic red circle with white logotype extended across all four Coke variants in both can and bottle form. Many critics suggested that consumers would be bamboozled by the more uniform design and pick the wrong Coke (the horror!) as a result. Others suggested that the new red circle conveys a vaguely menacing Japanese feel, as if a band of deadly Yakuza had stormed Coke’s Atlanta offices and taken control. Many more trotted out the old New Coke cliché and claimed (for the 400th time) this was the biggest mistake since that famous debacle in 1985 when the company changed the recipe of its flagship product.

Coca-Cola redesign

None of these criticisms is particularly accurate or concerning. Coca-Cola doesn’t do this kind of thing lightly. The design took a total of 18 months to complete, involved six global design agencies and relied on data from 14 separate market tests. As with most big marketing decisions, a couple of big market tests will always confirm whether your approach is going to work and how much incremental money it will save or generate.

The new Coke label is important for marketers because it illustrates the growing awareness of the power of the graphical elements, other than the logo, that can grab awareness and quickly imply brand image in the mind of the consumer. Some call them codes, others have named them distinctive assets, some refer to them as brand icons. Whatever the terminology, they are becoming increasingly important to marketers as consumer attention wanes and brand proliferation increases.

Every brand has a logo. And a logo is a code of the brand. But some brands, especially older and more creative ones, have other graphical elements that consumers strongly associate with the company. Sometimes it’s a specific colour like Tiffany blue – or Pantone 1837 to be litigiously precise. Occasionally it’s a specific pattern or motif like the check of Burberry or the red star of Heineken. It can sometimes be a more specific image like the horse for Hermès or the Cartier panther. You get the idea.

In my experience identifying all the brand codes that exist and then getting a company to focus on only a select few to build their presence in the market can be just as important as the work done on brand positioning or brand architecture. Stage one is working out what the long list of potential codes looks like. Stage two is operationalising a smaller sub-set that the company will explicitly focus on going forward. Stage three is scrupulously applying these codes to every possible consumer touchpoint.

Consumers tire of logos very quickly, but a creatively or cleverly applied code can fascinate and compel a consumer in equal measure. It’s a magic trick most brands miss. It’s amazing when you look at a company’s advertising or its digital presence just how generic and free from codes most touchpoints are. This is more than just packaging; brand codes can be abstracted and used everywhere. I’ll wager that the Coke circle is going to be appearing in a lot more places than the side of the can by the end of the year. Every pixel is an opportunity to build brand if you believe in codes, but you have to know the codes and how to apply them to reap the benefits.

While I continue to believe that Coke is about to experience the kind of market erosion that will see their organisation fall and possibly fail in the difficult years ahead, I do admire the way they are fiddling while Rome gets toasty. The now ubiquitous Coke circle, along with the deep red colour, the curved silhouette of its iconic bottle and Haddan Sundblom’s Santa Claus illustration provide – along with the logo – a rich symbolic vocabulary to help activate Coke’s One Brand strategy. They won’t stop the brand’s ultimate decline, but they might go some way to delaying it.

Mark Ritson Mini MBA promo

We’ve teamed up with award-winning columnist and Professor Mark Ritson to bring you a new online learning experience. The MW Mini MBA in Marketing is a CPD accredited, MBA standard course. Cover the same core modules as leading MBA programmes, in just 12 lessons, it will give you the tools you need to do your job better. For more information click here.



There are 6 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. I was fortunate enough to have had worked with James, when he was at Attik, not surprised re the quality of his work, dude was a genius, despite being born in Yorkshire:-)

    But the key question for me is Coke going to go defensive or offensive re sugar content? Personally I am sick to the back teeth of people blaming companies and marketing campaigns when we should be targeting ineffectual parenting instead.

    I have 2 teenage girls who very occasionally have a fizzy drink, instead preferring water. Let’s face it how is a 30 second ad, logo or promotion going to be more influential than many years of decent parenthood. So let us stop blaming a messenger and instead focus on the real influencers, parents.

  2. Khairul Islam 26 Apr 2016

    Never mind Japan: at least Diet Coke has a silver, not white, background so it won’t get confused with the Far Eastern country’s flag.

    No, the real question is how much the Bangladesh Tourism Board paid Coke for the new Life packaging. Maybe the under-the-table deal may not be so obvious looking at the can, but on the bottle the flag resemblance is very distinct.

  3. Al King 28 Apr 2016

    “The design took a total of 18 months to complete, involved six global design agencies and relied on data from 14 separate market tests.” Jesus. Ours took 4 months, no agencies, 4 small regional tests and it’s just as good. They trained me well and I’m grateful, but that kind of inflated budget and process is just bollocks. Id have put it into R&D on non sugar drinks.

  4. Corinne 4 May 2016

    Coke is going down – I write about something called “The Digital Physics of Truth.” It’s about how we are in an era of transparency – I don’t think that Coca-Cola is excluded from the wrath of anti-sugar bloggers. GE had a $40M deficit just last year due to the abrasive shift in consumer preferences catalyzed by consumer awareness. It’s only a matter of time until Coca-Cola feels the heat! Check out my article here:

  5. keith_lucas 1 Aug 2016

    As if to fulfil his own prophesy, the Coke red circle seems even to have cunningly sneaked into the logo for Mr Ritson’s Mini MBA.

Leave a comment