Mark Ritson: Tesla’s online-only move doesn’t herald the retail apocalypse

Many marketers will see Tesla’s decision to shut its dealerships in favour of online sales as another example of physical retail’s decline, but the real reason is more mundane – cash.

There is so much to like about Elon Musk. So much. The ball-busting media interviews in which declares himself “bored” with Earth and intent on moving to Mars.

His occasional acts of supreme market orientation, in which he listens to customers, changes his business model and responds back to the customers to confirm the fix – all in a few short hours.

And then there are the moments of Barnum-like promotional alacrity in which Musk decides, apparently on a whim, to do something ‘big’. Like sending his own car into space.

I loved that last one especially. I followed ‘Starman’ and his journey into space more keenly than any other PR stunt I’ve ever encountered. Something about the real-time images of a Tesla Roadster leaving Earth’s orbit and shooting past Mars at 44,500mph playing Bowie on the radio got to me. The images were dream-like. The idea that the car is now 226 million miles from Earth on the other side of the solar system still blows my mind.

And it started to work. At least on me. The sudden surge of interest in Starman led to an equal interest in the Tesla Roadster. I started reading about the car. I switched to exploring the cost of buying a second-hand one.

Then I learned a new Tesla Roadster was being readied for launch. I looked up the specs. I considered the deposit. I prepared for the discussion with my wife when I drove it home for the first time. I spent lot of time working on that last one, actually.

Tesla was still top of my mind a week later when I went to service my Porsche at the local dealership. While I was waiting I found George, the man who had sold it to me a few years earlier, and told him about my new-found desire for a Tesla.

He agreed but then showed me the confidential specs for a new, totally electric Porsche codenamed Mission E. It would launch in 2020 and George had two he could pre-sell (I know, I know).

We looked at pictures, we looked at specs, he raised his eyebrows suggestively, I blew the occasional impressed whistle. Two hours later I’d put down a deposit for what would eventually be named the Porsche Taycan and which will arrive on my driveway at the end of next year. Which still gives me loads of time to work out what I am going to say to Mrs R.

tesla porsche
Left: Porsche Taycan. Right: Tesla Roadster

It’s a classic bait and switch story. One company gets you through the top of the funnel only to lose you in the lower reaches of the funnel to a bigger, better-run operator who steals away the sale.

Private labels have been doing it for decades to manufacturer brands. Heinz spends a small fortune convincing you that beans are a healthy, versatile meal for the whole family and ensuring the brand has the requisite level of salience to close the deal. Then, with every stage of the funnel from awareness to preference paid for and established by Heinz, it loses out in the last six inches of the sale, somewhere between preference and purchase, to a private label.

As your hand reaches for the Heinz beans you spot the baked beans from Sainsbury’s in a similar blue livery but less than half the price. And it’s over. That price differential is only possible because a big part of the cost of goods for Heinz are all the advertising investments and promotional costs that a private label can not only avoid, but parasitically feed off.

I used to call this ‘cuckoo marketing’ after the eponymous bird. The cuckoo is an amazing animal. It often can’t be bothered with motherhood so flies into someone else’s nest, kicks out the existing tenants, drops her future progeny off in the newly vacated spot, and then fucks off on a cuckoo 18-30 holiday and drinks heavily for a fortnight boasting about what she has just pulled off.

The power of physical retail

Aside from cuckoo marketing, my Tesla story – correction, my Porsche story – also illustrates the power of distribution. Yes, it’s the place where we buy stuff. But it’s also the place where we meet the brand and, to use Scott Galloway’s accurate and arousing analogy, have sex with it for the first time.

Yes, the internet pornography of online shopping and ‘social selling’ exists. But for a lot of purchases we need more than a virtual hand job to get us down the aisle. The real relationship can only be consummated with an initial, and sometimes repeated, bout of physical intimacy at point of sale.

READ MORE: Why future success on the high street could mean collaborating with ‘frenemies’

That’s a crucial point for Tesla because last week the company announced it is closing its whole distributor network. The company had 378 stores and service facilities worldwide with 23 of them in the UK and Ireland. A few large showrooms will apparently remain but servicing and sales will now be conducted for the most part via smartphones.

The company claims that you can now buy a Tesla on your phone in “about one minute”. “We are also making it much easier to try out and return a Tesla, so that a test drive prior to purchase isn’t needed,” according to Tesla.

It’s easy to read about the decision and immediately jump to the ‘shopping apocalypse’ theory beloved of every disruptive marketer on the planet. You know the story by now: high street retailers are closing down because the future is clicks not bricks. In an Amazon/Google world of ‘online consumers’, physical stores are an unnecessary cost and strategic complication.

By 2025 the techno-porn fantasy of drones/artificial intelligence/online everything will render shops obsolete. Toys R Us did not close because it was shit, it closed because the future is totally different from the present. Also, bitcoin, blockchain, wearables, millennials and TikTok.

Except, as usual, this simplistic narrative does not hold up to even three minutes of scrutiny. It’s true that many stores are closing but that’s been happening since biblical times. It was Moses, I believe, in Deuteronomy who first observed that: “The shiteth merchant will inherit shiteth results and then the wind.”

Bad stores are closing, but good ones are also opening. Payless Shoes closed 408 doors last year in America and spawned a hundred articles about the end of retail stores as we know it. Dollar General opened 900 new shops in America and no-one mentioned it. The retail apocalypse is not quite the end of days that was predicted.

Source: US Department of Commerce

While most ‘modern’ marketers get lathered up about the growth of online shopping and Amazon’s steely grip on all of us, the hard statistics confirm that more than 90% of all shopping continues to happen in stores, not online. Which is not to say that that Amazon is not an amazing retailer or that it does not have a spectacular share of online shopping. Almost half of all online sales in America and a third in the UK are made via Amazon’s site.

That still makes Amazon significantly smaller in the UK than retailers like Tesco and Sainsbury and also prompts the question why such online domination would warrant a move to offline stores? In acquiring Whole Foods and opening physical bookstores Amazon appears intent on expanding into bricks-and-mortar retailing at the very time we are being told that the retail apocalypse renders the move foolish.

Amazon’s intransigence is relatively simple to understand. Despite what we are told at conferences, the online consumer does not exist. She inhabits her own world and manages, amazingly easily, to traverse online and the offline as if they were part of the same thing.

Smart organisations are replicating this fluidity through omnichannel retailing. Whether you visit in store, or online, or a bit of both, you can rely on the same prices, same loyalty card, same service model and even the ability to pick up your abandoned basket wherever you shop.

In truth, most brands enjoy top- and bottom-of-funnel effects from online retailing but also enjoy significant impact from physical interactions in stores for the middle of the journey. Omnichannel brands like Apple want the immediacy and efficiency of online e-tailing but also the experiential wow and prescriptive capabilities of physical stores too. And there is no reason, other than fallacy or funding, why both cannot be utilised accordingly.

While most ‘modern’ marketers get lathered up about the growth of online shopping, the hard statistics confirm that more than 90% of all shopping continues to happen in stores.

To be more prosaic, you clearly need a fully commercial online presence. But you also need George in the Porsche showroom, drinking his flat white, ready to spring into action when he sees me wander past his desk.

It’s not flash and we do not write many marketing articles about it. But do not mistake the power of physical retail presence. It might be costly, but it endures. Take my own car purchase as an exemplar. George beat Elon Musk, David Bowie, a rocket ship to Mars and a car navigating the solar system to win my business. Not bad, eh?

Surely Tesla understands this? It set up its 378-location retail footprint for exactly this reason. Why suddenly close everything down and move to an exclusively online model?

Short-term v long-term profit

Its shift has nothing to do with a retail apocalypse and a lot more to do with cash flow. On paper Tesla is now impressively profitable and incredibly cash rich. Its Q4 gross margins of 24% are enough to make most other auto makers green. And, as a result, Tesla has now amassed an impressive cash mountain of $3.7bn.

But Tesla is not your normal, established car company. Elon Musk has wonderful dreams but they come with nightmarish cost implications. He needs to build a Chinese production facility, a solar tile capability and a global super-charging network to keep his growing fleet of cars on the road, and he needs to start manufacturing the all-important Model 3 in gigantic numbers to match demand.

READ MORE: Mark Ritson: It’s time to shut down digital marketing teams for good

To finance the Tesla journey Musk has already borrowed big. On Friday a massive repayment of convertible debt was due. If Tesla’s share price had been trading at or above $359.87 the company could have repaid that debt with stock. But it wasn’t. And the whole $920m – about a quarter of Tesla’s reserves – will need to be paid in cash instead. More debts are ultimately due down the track – about $10bn in total. Liquidity has suddenly become a Tesla priority.

And while the Model 3 is the car that was always meant to transform Tesla into an established automotive giant it comes with its own significant problem: profitability. The Model 3 was never intended to be an exclusive vehicle. Musk needs to sell around half a million of these cars every year to reach the kind of scale he now needs. All of Tesla’s previous cars, from the Roadster to the Model S, were premium line extensions designed to build Tesla’s brand associations of being high-end and superior, so it could then launch the Model 3 and clean up the mass market with an affordable sub-brand.

To achieve that mass market penetration Musk promised to set the Model 3 price at $35,000 (£26,400). That makes it less expensive than a Toyota RAV4. And while that price will certainly drive enormous interest and probably deliver the half a million-unit sales, it also means that operating costs must be clipped to retain the margins.

Musk himself admits that it is proving “excruciatingly difficult” to make a profit from the Model 3 at this price. Killing the tremendous fixed costs associated with showrooms, sales staff and their associated operating expenses is the only way he can sell the Model 3 at this price and make enough profit.

And while Musk has tried to dress the decision as one consistent with the modern Tesla approach, his ultimate trait of unfailing honesty reveals a CEO ill at ease with the decision. “I wish there was some other way,” he admitted last week. “Unfortunately, it will entail a reduction in force on the retail side. There’s no way around it.”

Rather than another example of the retail apocalypse and the shift to exclusively online sales, Tesla’s move should be seen as an illustration of the more mundane corporate agenda to generate profits and cash flow to fund growth. Dress it up in 21st-century language all you want, but this is the story of a company making a decision to drive short-term profitability at the expense of the long-term health and prospects of the brand.

Sometimes such moves are unavoidable and Musk, who gets long-term better than anyone, surely appreciates the trade-off he has just made. It’s easy to be precious about such moves. But there is no long term if the short term cannot be delivered and it’s time to pay the fiscal piper.

Tesla sits finely poised between becoming either a century-shredding saga of future greatness or a cautionary tale of entrepreneurial folly from the pioneering early days of the solar revolution. No-one, including Musk I suspect, knows how it ends yet.

As strong as the Tesla brand is, and as impressive and enigmatic as Musk continues to be, omnichannel beats either an exclusive focus on offline retailing or an exclusive move to online sales. According to Musk 78% of Model 3 sales were already conducted online and 82% secured without a test drive. But that’s a clumsy example of last-click attribution if I ever I saw it and beneath the Musk I have grown to admire. How many of those sales were sparked or secured by a visit to a showroom?

Maybe most of his existing Tesla fans bought without a test drive but he is now penetrating the mass market. A test drive is a crucial moment of truth – especially when its your first electric vehicle, let alone your first Tesla.

In automotive marketing you need a physical network. It’s costly but it’s essential. You need test drive options. You need stuff explained. You need to open the doors. To close the boot. To sit in the seat. To “squeeze your bananas” before the sale, as one retailer once explained it to me.

You need George, sipping on his flat white. Waiting.

Recommended

Comments

There are 10 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. tom wright 5 Mar 2019

    By the time Tesla has worked out its production problems we might well have stopped owning cars, preferring to get an app-controlled AI driven Uber – even if we’re going to France. Even to the physical shops which we might still visit. Personally I think George is going to mash them good and proper – all the big German marques are bringing out fully electric luxury cars, have much larger and convertible production lines and distribution networks . . . . easier to test, buy, service, easier to get as a company car, easier to sell on. . .

  2. DAVID THOMPSON 5 Mar 2019

    lol “squeeze your bananas”

  3. Tadas R. 6 Mar 2019

    Nice article, we need more marketing articles like this.

  4. Al King 7 Mar 2019

    Swiss Toni: Watch me. Learn from me. I could teach you everything there is to know about this business. These aren’t cars we’re selling here, they’re dreams. And to know about cars, to know about dreams, you have to know about women.
    Paul: Right, yes, Swiss.
    Swiss Toni: A woman is not just a creature that likes fine wines, Whitney Houston films, and the manly smell of a pipe. A woman is a mysterious, complex box of tricks. When you’re selling a car to woman, you have to imagine you’re making love to her. You have to seduce her. And when she buys, that’s the Big-O: Orgasm central. Multiple orgasm would be if she bought lots of cars.
    Paul: Like a fleet?
    Swiss Toni: Yes, but, that never happens.
    Paul: What if you’re selling a car to a bloke?
    Swiss Toni: Then it’s all about todgers. These aren’t cars, they’re todgers.
    Paul: But I thought you said they were dreams?
    Swiss Toni: You ever dream about todgers, Paul?
    Paul: No.
    Swiss Toni: No, no. Neither do I, obviously. When you’re selling a car to man, it all comes down to who’s got the biggest todger. You have to make him think that his is bigger. But, in order to sell it to him, you have to know that yours is the biggest. You have to keep telling yourself, “I’ve got the biggest todger in the world”.

  5. Dave Wakeman 7 Mar 2019

    This seems accurate all around to me.

    I think about my own buying journey and I took the S and X for a test drive before I bought the Model 3 online.

    This was due to the fact that until about 2 weeks before delivery, they didn’t have models available for test drive.

    Also, back to George and his Flat White, I also finally took a test drive before I took delivery of the car and added about $5,000 more in technology and features that I didn’t realize I wanted until my George took me through the process.

  6. Rahul Sonnad 9 Mar 2019

    Good insights, but disagree with the premise that Tesla is trading long term for short term profits. I think rather, Elon has determined that the high price elasticity of demand especially on lower end cars is so high that lowering the price will sell more cars at lower overhead than paying for the sales channel. In the short term, Tesla has a major supply constraint related to ramping production. As long as there is enough demand to absorb the supply, marketing channels are just not worth the investment. And in general there is probably very little supply elasticity on the vehicles as long as we’re in the sub 1m units/model range.

    Elon also fully confident in the rapid evolution of auto-pilot functionality this year, and is operating under the assumption that once this evolves, it will significantly increase demand. Thus ensuring the supply constraint even as production ramps. I personally agree with Elon that for the majority of people, great ADAS (auto-pilot) – once they really experience it – will become the key must-have feature for their daily driver.

    This would also result in the author’s buyers remorse if he actually goes ahead with the Taycan, due to its inability to continually upgrade its assisted driving performance. Luckily for him, (if Elon’s right), he’ll have plenty of time to realize this before he actually buys the Taycan.

  7. Ros Collins 10 Mar 2019

    From a personal perspective its no loss. On two occasions I went into a Tesla dealership I was completely ignored even though there was no one else in store. Clearly I am not the right “kind” of person to own a Tesla so I went elsewhere and spent more money than the Tesla cost!!. Complained and had a call from a Customer Service Manager (in Netherlands!) who apologised profusely and said I had clearly been mistaken in my thinking. Went into the same one again and still got ignored while the guy played on his phone!!

  8. Phil Rubin 10 Mar 2019

    Wonderful article on the reality that is retail. It’s not going away but it is, as always, the Darwinism of business. Whether Tesla survives this short-term decision will be interesting, especially given what might be happen in the broader economies.

  9. Heather Johnston 11 Mar 2019

    Distance dealing is an interesting question. Prior to the webby-inter-thingy we had mail order, and some countries had much bigger mail order sectors than others, usually for items you did not want to be seen buying (sex toys), if you were a long way away from big cities (flyover states) or where retail hours or locations were very restricted, as in Germany. The top limit for mail order as a percentage of general retail was about 12%. Looking at the book trade, downloads are – about 12%. Music went digital but even here, some types of music are not a download market.
    I rarely buy so much as an electric kettle without picking it up and shaking it, and I certainly need a test drive not only in the make of car, but the particular car I’m spending thousands on. If you’re a fleet buyer this may not matter, and if you’re an absolute techie you may buy just on spec, but Jane, Bob and the kids will want to know you can fit a skateboard, a cat-basket and Grannie in the thing and you can’t do that on a website.

  10. Tadas R. 11 Mar 2019

    It looks that Elon is reading your articles and just did a U turn on the closing decision.

Leave a comment

Close

Discover even more as a subscriber

This article is available for subscribers only.

Sign up now for your access-all-areas pass.

Subscribers get unlimited access to unrivalled coverage of the biggest issues in marketing and world-renowned columnists, alongside carefully curated reports and briefings from Econsultancy. Find out more.

If you are an existing print subscriber find out how you can get access here.

Subscribe now

Got a question?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3703 or email customerservices@marketingweek.com

If you are looking for our Jobs site, please click here

Subscribers get unlimited access to unrivalled coverage of the biggest issues in marketing and world-renowned columnists, alongside carefully curated reports and briefings from Econsultancy. Find out more.

If you are an existing print subscriber find out how you can get access here.

Subscribe now