New channel, but a 1980s mentality

Wow, isn’t the new age of digital marketing so exciting for the data professional? Loads of new metrics, types of data, volumes of instantaneous customer numerical and textual sound bites to store, manipulate, masticate over and hopefully provide actionable insight upon.

But the biggest barrier to real insight and connectivity of customer information I can see is the people often commissioned by advertisers to create the vehicle to allow the opportunity to collect this valuable information. Data which could be a goldmine for clients, but turns out to be a shallow pool of soggy mud.

What type of people set-up short term customer data collection mechanisms, beautifully designed and constructed to create a myopic view of the consumer’s life? What type of people only see one dimension of customer analysis, that of macro level reports from Google Analytics? What people only see what they do in isolation from other activity and the possibility that the response to their micro site is the cumulative effect of a multitude of touch-points and possibly years of brand equity? What type of people often see the detailed data they collect on behalf of the client as a throwaway by-product and someone else’s problem at best?

The people I am referring to are those digital agencies who claim to be only “creative”. And there are hundreds of so-called agencies, abusing their position of customer data custodians. They act like 1980’s sales promotion agencies, who used to collect response from off-the-page ads and then use the response coupon as the product delivery label, without bothering to capture the names and addresses of the response device.

So many boutique digital agencies seem not to be even mildly interested in the concept of database marketing, single customer views and basic customer analysis. These new agencies need to stop being arrogant and stating they are the new wave of media and grasp the axioms of customer data and their responsibility to the client to use data wisely.

Even if the ethical position of advising the client correctly does not wash with these people, then commercially it would make their position with the client far better as they stop being just creative and become strategic. End of rant.

By Huw Davis, managing director, Huw Davis Partnership


Too cool for school

MaryLou Costa

I met Stephen Cheliotis, chief executive of the Centre for Brand Analysis, at its Soho HQ a few weeks ago for an exclusive briefing ahead of the release of this year’s CoolBrands list. It’s a list of 500 brands deemed to be Britain’s coolest by a specifically chosen “expert council” and a YouGov survey of […]

Comet is on the right lines

Marketing Week

Having read your news article “Comet promotes ’lifestyle’ and fun aspects of products” (MW 16 September), it is encouraging to see a high street brand with a progressive understanding of what the in-store experience means to today’s consumer. Comet recognizes that shoppers want to push buttons, open doors and ask a lot of questions when making major purchases. Web shopping, while often cheaper, does not scratch that itch.


    Leave a comment