P&G’s ‘Irresistible Superiority’: Savvy slogan or meaningless mantra?

P&G’s new strategy has baffled industry experts, as some say it risks becoming nothing more than a “meaningless mantra”.


When Procter and Gamble (P&G) unveiled its new ‘Irresistible Superiority’ mindset to analysts last week, it was met with confusion and bafflement.

After all, what does it really mean? Chief financial officer Jon Moeller attempted to win over his audience by explaining how the company is overhauling its approach to advertising, products, packaging, sampling and in-store promotions – all in order to drive growth.

When Marketing Week approached the FMCG giant for further comment, we were told that as part of the shift it is now taking a “body of evidence approach”, where P&G will look at all the factors that drive product success. In the past, it admits, it might have “focused on individual elements disproportionally”.

“Irresistibly superior products are delivered in irresistibly superior packages. Irresistibly superior product and packaging benefits are communicated to consumers with superior brand communication. In order to be successful, we need to be doing all of these things well, consistently,” a spokesman says.

That might not have quite cleared up the confusion. But what it seems is that P&G wants to take a more holistic approach to its brands. And the hope is that as a result, consumers will see that its products are so good they don’t need to use any others.

“At the heart of this story is something very simple. P&G wants to build old school equity in their brands so that they can stand up to aggressive competitor pricing and value promotions. It wants to up the ante on consumer experiences and do better advertising,” Mike Oliver, head of brand engagement at independent marketing and communications agency Radley Yeldar, explains.

P&G has given the new brand strategy its very own name – and are repeating it ad infinitum until it becomes a meaningless mantra.

Mike Oliver, Radley Yeldar

Put like that it makes sense. But the need to brand the strategy and call it out as a new way of thinking and behaving is unclear. If P&G and its brand managers weren’t doing this before, what were they doing?

“P&G has given the new brand strategy its very own name – and are repeating it ad infinitum until it becomes a meaningless mantra. All it does is make people become increasingly cynical and forensic in the way they interrogate your thinking,” adds Oliver.

Fighting slowing growth

The reason why P&G wants to adopt this strategy is clear at least. Its latest results showed slowing sales, caused by difficult market conditions such as “geopolitical disruptions” like Brexit and foreign exchange challenges.

Moeller also admitted the financial outlook was not “likely to be better in the medium term”, which is why the company is making several strategic changes.

With that backdrop, P&G needs to make sure it is being as efficient and effective as possible across the business, whether that is packaging, product or marketing.

“Don’t get me wrong – I think it’s well intentioned. P&G is clearly recognising that its advertising campaigns need to drive growth more effectively. It implies that is has a high bar, which is also good,” says Andy Brent, author of ‘The Growth Director’s Secret’ and former CMO at Barclays.

As part of the strategy change, P&G is also taking a more vigorous approach to its communications by testing the quality of its ads. A campaign must drive growth for a full year, and is judged by a panel. Always’ ‘Like A Girl’ has currently achieved that. But not everyone is a fan of P&G’s panel idea.

“Retrospectively looking at whether acceptable growth is being delivered is symptomatic of a company that has lost the ability to understand consumer motivations well enough to predict in advance whether a brand is positioned to grow or not,” Brent says.

Who is driving growth?

Brent also questions why it is a CFO explaining the strategy.

“It’s just strange for a CFO to be contemplating this concept. You wouldn’t expect a CTO to talk about a company’s HR strategy. It seems everybody’s chipping in because there’s a lack of focus. To me, that says there’s a lack of accountability when it comes to growing the business,” he explains.

It’s just strange for a CFO to be contemplating this concept. You wouldn’t expect a CTO to talk about a company’s HR strategy.

Andy Brent, Bloom Group Consulting

Other FMCG brands have recently appointed chief growth officers. Coca-Cola is the most recent, getting rid rid of its global chief marketing officer function by merging it with customer, strategy and commercial leadership to create a new ‘chief growth officer’ role.

Questions have previously been raised over why this role is needed, but with P&G looking for new ways to seek out growth in a difficult market, appointing its own CGO could make sense.

READ MORE: Coca-Cola ditches global CMO role in leadership shake-up

“Appointing a growth director would be a big positive step, and companies should join the 21st century and learn how to use the new generation of neuroscience-based research tools that can assess propensity for growth before the ad is made,” adds Brent.

A push to be more premium?

Moeller admited during the call that he was worried about analysts misinterpreting the ‘Irresistibly Superior’ approach: “I’m very concerned here that there’s a misperception that a bar of irresistible superiority in products and packaging denotes higher prices or that we could get driven by a slogan and not by the consumer because that’s not what we’re all about here.”

Unfortunately, P&G might have missed the mark by not thinking through the implications of its message and by discounting the fact there are undeniably premium and elitist connotations attached to Irresistible Superiority.

“Countering accusations that Irresistible Superiority is just a premium strategy with the defence that it applies at every price segment in the market is head scratching stuff,” says Radley Yeldar’s Oliver.

“P&G’s Irresistible Superiority strategy and the way it is currently being communicated runs the risk of totally undermining its own point. Great, irresistible brands are compelling, credible and distinctive. This strategy seems to struggle to tick any of those boxes.”

Having a mantra for growth, whatever a company wants to call it, can help to focus the minds of employees and make it clear to them, analysts and shareholders what the priorities are. This one might sound a bit jargony but ensuring its brand managers have a laser focus on effectiveness and being the best they can be is no bad thing.

However, P&G will need more than a snazzy slogan to turnaround slowing growth. Innovation and a deep understanding of consumers will be key, especially as economic difficulties are unlikely to ease over the next few years. Reaching its irresistibly superior targets while at the same time cutting back on things like agency fees and media spend will be a difficult act to balance.

There is still time to enter Marketing Week’s Masters of Marketing awards, taking place in October. For more information on the awards including a full category list and how to enter, visit www.festivalofmarketing.com/awards



There are 5 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Brian George 8 May 2017

    Surely this is going back to basics, and if P&G marketers weren’t doing this previously, just what where they doing? Maybe that’s the reason for the sales slow-down, a lack of focus, which isn’t really helped by a CFO promoting an arguably elitist proposition that he doesn’t really sound convinced of anyway! But then they are missing a CGO, although hang-on isn’t growth what marketers are supposed to be achieving in the first place!!

  2. malcolm wicks 8 May 2017

    I like the concept of constantly asking across the business what gives a product irresistible superiority. It could be any aspect of the 4P’s. I understand the argument that P&G should be doing this already but in the disruptions of the last couple of years many companies have been distracted. Customers are now behaving differently too. It’s not just about price. For example they will pay more for products that are easier to open, easier to use, talk directly to customers and superior products (just look at sales of Mercedes).

    I love buying “irresistible superior”products at a right price and wish P&G well in driving the two words relentlessly across their business.

  3. dinger 8 May 2017

    hyperbole + superlative = redundancy

  4. Roland Ferguson from NH 8 May 2017

    Irresistible Superiority is absolute gibberish. I worked at P&G for many years and every couple of years they would come up with a new slogan and nothing changed. The leadership continued with business as usual, plodding along treating the company like their personal piggy bank. It’s time for Trian to fix this clunker. It’s obvious CEO David Taylor has failed. His biggest accomplishment having been to sell off a bunch of brands and pay himself a $4MM reorganization bonus. Kerti Singh, the Consumer and Market/Innovation VP, has also been an abject failure. He failed to see the threat from dollar shave club/cheaper razors, pitching more expensive razors instead, while losing 20% of Gillette’s share. It’s time to fire these bums and get some outside leadership who won’t run this company like it’s a seventh grade science project.

  5. Jim Souhegan 9 May 2017

    Yes, this is a sad state of affairs when a once great marketing company puts out a message that is this out of touch and confusing. Also given that the CFO put out the message vs the CEO is sad. Obviously the board of directors doesn’t trust the CEO. The median HH income in this country is ~$56M, which doesn’t leave much for discretionary spending. Do they really think their goods will be so irresistible that households will chose their expensive products over new tech devices or Starbucks coffee. The market research function of this company should all be fired because they are giving very bad advice and flawed perspectives to the leadership, who is obviously out of touch.

Leave a comment