Russell Parsons: Loyalty schemes need a rethink to ensure long-term engagement

My favourite advert from 2014 was Lidl’s unpicking of Morrisons’ ‘Match & More’ loyalty scheme, a hybrid scheme that pledged to match Lidl and Aldi on price. The ad detailed the many steps customers had to take to receive the difference back. It ended with an absolutely killer pay-off: “Or you could just go to Lidl”.

Russell Parsons

Twelve months on, Morrisons appears to have conceded defeat, dropping the  ‘match’ element of its scheme to focus on offering ‘more’ in response to customer feedback.

Research by Blue Yonder, unveiled here, confirms that customers are cold to matching schemes with only 12% of customers stating they have taken retailers up on their promise to match prices.

Morrisons has concluded that the key to long-term engagement is a simple scheme that adds tangible rewards, not ones that required consumers to carve a chunk out of their precious free time.

However, it is not as simple as that. The future direction of loyalty schemes is a live issue for marketers both as a means to engender loyalty and to extract data. According to a recent investigation by The Telegraph there are almost £6bn in unclaimed points sitting idle. Nectar cardholders, for example, are sitting on a whopping £424m, while Tesco Clubcard holders are eschewing a cool £284m.

Retailers are busy capturing shoppers’ behavioural data to do with as they will but the traditional quid pro quo of give and take appears to be under threat. New thinking is required.

Some have begun this process. John Lewis has signed up 1.6 million customers in two years to its my John Lewis loyalty scheme and claims to have high levels of engagementAt risk of being premature in calling it a success, its achievements are down to personalisation – cardholders are rewarded with personalised content and previews – and digitisation via the app.

M&S is set to follow suit when it rolls out its scheme later this year.

Morrisons has correctly concluded that simplicity is key but it and others should not sit back and marvel at the old way of doing things. Offering rewards is a start but will not be enough in itself.

Recommended

Brands battle over best approach to pricing

Mindi Chahal

New data suggests price match schemes don’t attract much uptake from consumers, but they do have an effect on perception of value while vouchers are more likely to drive sales, so marketers must use these tactics in the right situations.

Comments

    Leave a comment

    Close

    Discover even more as a subscriber

    This article is available for subscribers only.

    Sign up now for your access-all-areas pass.

    Subscribers get unlimited access to unrivalled coverage of the biggest issues in marketing and world-renowned columnists, alongside carefully curated reports and briefings from Econsultancy. Find out more.

    If you are an existing print subscriber find out how you can get access here.

    Subscribe now

    Got a question?

    Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3703 or email customerservices@marketingweek.com

    If you are looking for our Jobs site, please click here

    Subscribers get unlimited access to unrivalled coverage of the biggest issues in marketing and world-renowned columnists, alongside carefully curated reports and briefings from Econsultancy. Find out more.

    If you are an existing print subscriber find out how you can get access here.

    Subscribe now