Visa demands ‘more forthright comms’ from FIFA to combat corruption scandal

Visa has become the latest sponsor to condemn FIFA’s response to recent corruption charges, following Coca-Cola’s move to protect its brand from the fallout by demanding more “forthright” communications from the beleaguered organisation.


The financial firm has publically revealed its misgivings about the transparency of the bidding process for the 2018 and 2022 World Cups. By doing so, it is looking to force football’s governing body into resolving the conflicting views around an investigation into both bids, which are alleged to have been awarded to Russia and Qatar illegally.

Visa said it is “troubled” by the ensuing furore from both the public and the media and has insisted to FIFA that it take a more proactive approach to tempering the mounting concerns. The organisation has denied any wrongdoing in the days since Coke became the first sponsor to slam the investigation and has said that both Emirates and Sony’s decisions to end their sponsorships were unrelated to the recent scandal.

Despite its concerns, Visa is unlikely to cut its lucrative commercial ties to FIFA after penning a new deal to 2022 earlier this year. But like Coke, which has also extended its deal, the world’s biggest credit card firm hopes its efforts are seen as it taking an ethical stance, a move that could protect its reputation amid the controversy.

It is a tactic that is becoming more commonplace in the communications armouries of companies as they look to distance themselves from such controversies when tied to multimillion commercial deals. Zoopla axed its deal with West Bromwich Albion at the turn of the year following the club’s refusal to condemn striker Nicolas Anelka’s controversial ‘quenelle’ salute, while Adidas reviewed its deal with golfer Sergio Garcia 2013 following accusations he made a racist joke about rival Tiger Woods.

Adidas, BP and Hyundai have all yet to voice their opinions on the controversial investigation. The steady trickle of announcements from sponsors condemning FIFA echoes the same tactic that emerged earlier this year when several urged the organisation to investigate the bids after Sony became the first.

The news comes amid fresh reports that Sony has pulled its FIFA World Cup sponsorship. The rumours first came to light earlier this year but the company has not yet publically confirmed its decision.


Coca-Cola logo

Coke’s five ‘disruptive’ tips to break from marketing paradigms

Seb Joseph

Festival of Marketing: Coca-Cola is reshaping its marketing both internally and externally for a future when people will pay to see its content. The drinks maker’s European marketing boss Javier Sanchez-Lamelas shares five ways marketers can use content to disrupt their marketing strategies and influence the wider business.

Reaching the global tribe of the super-rich

Lucy Tesseras

High-net-worth consumers are digitally fixated, experience-loving and more likely to regard themselves as part of the affluent global set than a citizen of their home country, suggesting marketers need to take an international approach to their communications.


There is one comment at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. eddiemay 27 Nov 2014

    Interesting to see the build up of FIFA sponsors either speaking up or pulling out altogether. There is a dilemma for them in that they have to put clear water between their own reputations and that of FIFA, but the World Cup remains a huge marketing platform regardless of what anyone feels about the governing body. Is it better for a sponsor to walk away, or try to exert influence from within? I wrote about this dilemma only yesterday over on the Threepipe blog.

Leave a comment