Will Google make refreshing data deals beyond Heineken?

/m/u/x/MichaelBarnett.jpg

The targeted ad deal between Heineken and YouTube could be a sign of things to come. But brands will cry foul if Google’s data is the preserve of big-paying partners.

Under the deal, the Dutch brewer will place its ads on YouTube as well as other Google platforms in 20 countries. In return, it will be given access to Google data on how people who view Heineken’s ads behave on its sites, helping to make its ads more targeted.

According to Heineken financial communications manager John Paul Schuirink: “This will include information on what the preferences of our viewers are, where they shop, or what other words they search for on Google.”

The relationships between brands and the technology companies that now own some of the most important advertising and content platforms will be a defining feature in the development of digital advertising. Facebook, Apple and Google, to name some of the most prominent, are all adopting different approaches, but none has decided to make its data an open resource for advertisers.

Facebook provides performance analytics and a limited amount of anonymised demographic data to advertisers. This allows them to see, for example, when an ad is viewed by a friend of someone who is already a fan of the brand’s Facebook page. Apple, meanwhile, is notoriously stingy about the subscriber details that it offers to publishers of iPhone and iPad apps on its App Store.

Google appears now to be taking a piecemeal approach, by giving individual access to one brand. It may be testing the water, trying to work out how much transparency is really in its commercial interests – and indeed how much data its users want it to hand over to advertisers.

Heineken is unlikely to be the only brand that ultimately gets access to Google’s data, but the level of demand from advertisers is surely now going to be overwhelming for Google. Brands with whom Google has valued ad partnerships are likely to get testy if they feel they can’t play on a level playing field with their competitors.

Recommended

/w/w/e/PretaManger.jpg

Pret’s brand promise lost in translation

Mark Ritson

You don’t need me to tell you the story of Pret a Manger. Two young graduates, frustrated with the lunch options available to them in London, borrow £25,000 in 1986 to set up a café. It eventually thrives and gradually the Pret chain takes over London and then the rest of suburban Britain. The branding […]

Comments

    Leave a comment

    Close

    Discover even more as a subscriber

    This article is available for subscribers only.

    Sign up now for your access-all-areas pass.

    If you're an existing paid print subscriber find out how to get access here.

    Subscribers enjoy unlimited access to unrivalled coverage of the biggest issues in marketing, alongside practical advice from the digital experts at Econsultancy.

    With a subscription to Marketing Week Premium you will get full access to:

    > World-renowned columnists

    > Analysis & case studies

    > Exclusive leading-edge insight

    > Carefully curated reports & briefings from Econsultancy

    > Plus, much more including a £300 discount for the Festival of Marketing

    Subscribe now

    Got a question?

    Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3703 or email customerservices@marketingweek.com

    If you are looking for our Jobs site, please click here

    Subscribers enjoy unlimited access to unrivalled coverage of the biggest issues in marketing, alongside practical advice from the digital experts at Econsultancy.

    With a subscription to Marketing Week Premium you will get full access to:

    > World-renowned columnists

    > Analysis & case studies

    > Exclusive leading-edge insight

    > Carefully curated reports & briefings from Econsultancy

    > Plus, much more including a £300 discount for the Festival of Marketing

    Subscribe now