Marketers continue to ‘waste money’ as only 9% of digital ads are viewed for more than a second

New research suggests marketers must start thinking about digital display ads ‘like posters’ if they want to create the same engagement as TV, print or out-of-home advertising.

The vast majority of digital advertising is not being viewed at all, with many marketers still failing to apply effectiveness techniques learned from print and out-of-home to the channel, according to a new study.

Since January 2016, research firm Lumen has used laptop-mounted eye tracking cameras on 300 consumers’ laptops to collect visual data on what they notice when they are online. And over this period the study, which was run in partnership with Nectar-owner Aimia, recorded 30,000 minutes of data, with evidence relating to around 15,000 digital ads.

It found that only 35% of digital display ads received any views at all. And, of those, only 9% of ads received more than a second’s worth of attention. Only 4% of ads, meanwhile, received more than 2 seconds of engagement.

Lumen, which has branded the IAB’s requirement for a digital ad to get one second of dwell time in order to officially register as an impression “ludicrous”, urging marketers to apply learnings from print. As a channel, it says print still provides much more provable effectiveness than digital advertising.

Read more: ‘Newspapers need to get better at shouting about their effectiveness to advertisers’

Applying lessons from print into digital

Using data from its ‘press omnibus’ – a lab that tracks how readers view newspaper content – it compared digital display to print display.

It found that a full-page ad in a paper the same size as the tabloid the New York Daily News will be viewed by 88% of readers, for an average time of 2.8 seconds. In comparison, a billboard format ad on a website will get 38% of people looking for just 1.5 secondsgraphOn the whole, almost half (40%) of press ads are viewed for more than one second, compared to just 9% of digital ads, according to the Lumen study. A quarter of print ads are viewed for more than two seconds, nearly six times the rate of digital.

“The best digital ads do get looked at – but they tend to be simple, elegant, beautiful ads that a creative department would be proud of, rather than moving direct mail pieces,” clarifies Mike Follett, managing director of Lumen.

“When developing digital ads, creatives should ‘think like a poster’ rather than taking their cues from ‘performance marketers’, who have literally nothing to teach the advertising industry.”

Embracing smaller formats

Follett believes print brands such as The Telegraph, which built its digital presence around 10 second ads, are “on to a winner”.

“Marketers don’t quite understand that just because an ad can be seen, doesn’t mean it has to be seen.”

Mike Follett, managing director, Lumen

He adds: “As a channel, digital advertising is only 20 years old so it’s still far from a science. For it to create the same engagement as TV or out-of-home, digital marketers must start to realise that building an ad that has a duration of more than 10 seconds is probably a waste of money.”

Print ads are typically seen by 75% of readers for, on average 2.2 seconds, with digital ads seen by less than half this number, for less than half as long.

However, the biggest problem, according to Follett, is marketers not appreciating the limited time people actually spend on digital channels. He says ads are actually viewed for roughly a 10th of the time they are viewable.

Pointing to Meetrics data, which suggests UK marketers will waste up to £7.2bn on unseen digital ads in 2016, he concludes: “It is very cocky to think anyone is going to look at your digital video for more than 4 seconds. You don’t put a TV ad’s worth of content into a poster so why try to in digital channels? Digital marketers need to start thinking in terms of attention economics or they will just keep on failing.”

Hide Comments4 Show Comments
Comments
  • Steve Jex 2 Aug 2016 at 7:20 am

    The data on viewing times may well be right but how is this”wasting money” Most digital ads are free – until someone interacts with them, hence the expression PPC, Pay Per Click.
    “simple, elegant, beautiful ads” may get looked at but do they get interacted with? If they don’t, they’re pointless. Even ads that are designed to build awareness, i.e. brand building, will perform much better if there is a level of interaction to engage the viewer, rather than simply relying on him or her to read and digest it.

  • James C. Steadman 2 Aug 2016 at 9:37 am

    “When developing digital ads, creatives should ‘think like a poster’ rather than taking their cues from ‘performance marketers’, who have literally nothing to teach the advertising industry.”

    So don’t hold the creative to any measurable standards then? Got it. Will now make all my clients ads creative for creativity’s sake, and ignore all semblances of holding it accountable for driving revenue.

    What a load of rubbish.

    News flash: If your ads don’t provide a return, what are you doing them for?!

    Agencies need to stop stroking their egos and focus on return, not awards.

    Also, if you’re running digital ads on a CPM basis and it’s not to pull traffic into some form of native advertising or funnel, alarm bells should be ringing – loudly!

    CPC as Steve has already said is ‘free’ until someone clicks on it.

  • Neil Harris, Intently 2 Aug 2016 at 9:56 am

    And ad blocking is on the rise too!

  • Jimney123 9 Sep 2016 at 5:36 pm

    At print CPM’s 10 x that of digital, this means digital ads are generating approximately 9 seconds of dwell time vs. 1 second for print.

  • Post a comment

Latest from Marketing Week

NOT REGISTERED? IT'S FREE, QUICK AND EASY!

Access Marketing Week’s wealth of insight, analysis and opinion that will help you do your job better.

Register and receive the best content from the only UK title 100% dedicated to serving marketers' needs.

We’ll ask you just a few questions about what you do and where you work. The more we know about our visitors, the better and more relevant content we can provide for them. And, yes, knowing our audience better helps us find commercial partners too. Don't worry, we won't share your information with other parties, unless you give us permission to do so.

Register now

THE BEST CONTENT

Our award winning editorial team (PPA Digital Brand of the Year) ask the big questions about the biggest issues on everything from strategy through to execution to help you navigate the fast moving modern marketing landscape.

THE BIGGEST ISSUES

From the opportunities and challenges of emerging technology to the need for greater effectiveness, from the challenge of measurement to building a marketing team fit for the future, we are your guide.

PERSONAL AND PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT

Information, inspiration and advice from the marketing world and beyond that will help you develop as a marketer and as a leader.

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3711 or email subscriptions@marketingweek.com

If you are looking for our Jobs site, please click here